IHSN Survey Catalog
  • Home
  • Microdata Catalog
  • Citations
  • Login
    Login
    Home / Central Data Catalog / RUS_2012_ES_V01_M_WB
central

Enterprise Survey 2012

Russian Federation, 2011 - 2012
Get Microdata
Reference ID
RUS_2012_ES_v01_M_WB
Producer(s)
World Bank, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
Metadata
DDI/XML JSON
Created on
Mar 24, 2013
Last modified
Mar 29, 2019
Page views
14444
Downloads
1582
  • Study Description
  • Data Dictionary
  • Downloads
  • Get Microdata
  • Related Publications
  • Identification
  • Version
  • Scope
  • Coverage
  • Producers and sponsors
  • Sampling
  • Survey instrument
  • Data collection
  • Data processing
  • Data Access
  • Disclaimer and copyrights
  • Contacts
  • Metadata production
  • Identification

    Survey ID number

    RUS_2012_ES_v01_M_WB

    Title

    Enterprise Survey 2012

    Country
    Name Country code
    Russian Federation RUS
    Study type

    Enterprise Survey [en/oth]

    Series Information

    Firm-level surveys have been conducted since 1998 by different units within the World Bank. Since 2005-06, most data collection efforts have been centralized within the Enterprise Analysis Unit. Earlier data from different survey instruments have been matched to an older standard instrument for dissemination on the website.

    The Enterprise Surveys, implemented in Eastern Europe and Central Asia countries, also known as Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Surveys (BEEPS), are jointly conducted by the World Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development for this geographic region. The objective of the research is to gain an understanding of firms' perception of the environment in which they operate. The surveys were until now administered four times at an interval of three years. This has added an important element of dynamics in the study of business environment in transition countries.

    Abstract

    This research was conducted in Russian Federation between August 2011 and June 2012, as part of the fifth round of the Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey. The objective of the study is to obtain feedback from enterprises in client countries on the state of the private sector. The research is also used to build a panel of enterprise data that will make it possible to track changes in the business environment over time, thus allowing, for example, impact assessments of reforms. Through face-to-face interviews with firms in the manufacturing and services sectors, the survey assesses the constraints to private sector growth and creates statistically significant business environment indicators that are comparable across countries.

    In Russia, data from 4,220 establishments was analyzed. Stratified random sampling was used to select the surveyed businesses.

    The survey topics include firm characteristics, information about sales and suppliers, competition, infrastructure services, judiciary and law enforcement collaboration, security, government policies, laws and regulations, financing, overall business environment, bribery, capacity utilization, performance and investment activities, and workforce composition.

    In 2011, the innovation module was added to the standard set of Enterprise Surveys questionnaires to examine in detail how introduction of new products and practices influence firms' performance and management.

    Kind of Data

    Sample survey data [ssd]

    Unit of Analysis

    The primary sampling unit of the study is the establishment. An establishment is a physical location where business is carried out and where industrial operations take place or services are provided. A firm may be composed of one or more establishments. For example, a brewery may have several bottling plants and several establishments for distribution. For the purposes of this survey an establishment must make its own financial decisions and have its own financial statements separate from those of the firm. An establishment must also have its own management and control over its payroll.

    Version

    Version Description

    v01

    Version Date

    2012

    Scope

    Notes

    The scope of the study includes:

    • Characteristics of Establishment;
    • Infrastructure and Services;
    • Sales and Supplies;
    • Degree of Competition;
    • Innovation;
    • Land and Permits;
    • Crime;
    • Finance;
    • Business-Government Relations;
    • Use of Consulting Services;
    • Labor;
    • Business Environment;
    • Performance;
    • Expectations;
    • Perceptions of Obstacles.

    Coverage

    Geographic Coverage

    National

    Geographic Unit

    Regions covered are selected based on the number of establishments, contribution to employment, and value added. In most cases these regions are metropolitan areas and reflect the largest centers of economic activity in a country.

    Universe

    The manufacturing and services sectors are the primary business sectors of interest. This corresponds to firms classified with International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC) codes 15-37, 45, 50-52, 55, 60-64, and 72 (ISIC Rev.3.1). Formal (registered) companies with five or more employees are targeted for interview. Services firms include construction, retail, wholesale, hotels, restaurants, transport, storage, communications, and IT. Firms with 100% government/state ownership are not eligible to participate in Enterprise Surveys.

    Producers and sponsors

    Primary investigators
    Name
    World Bank
    European Bank for Reconstruction and Development
    Funding Agency/Sponsor
    Name
    World Bank
    European Bank for Reconstruction and Development

    Sampling

    Sampling Procedure

    The sample for Russian Federation was selected using stratified random sampling technique. Three levels of stratification were used in Russia: industry, establishment size, and region.

    Industry stratification was designed in the way that follows: the universe was stratified into eight manufacturing industries (food, wood and furniture, chemicals and plastics and rubber, non-metallic mineral products, fabricated metal products, machinery and equipment, electronics and precision instruments, and other manufacturing), and seven service industries (construction, wholesale, retail, hotels and restaurants, supporting transport activities, IT, and other services).

    Size stratification was defined following the standardized definition for the rollout: small (5 to 19 employees), medium (20 to 99 employees), and large (more than 99 employees). For stratification purposes, the number of employees was defined on the basis of reported permanent full-time workers. This seems to be an appropriate definition of the labor force since seasonal/casual/part-time employment is not a common practice, except in the sectors of construction and agriculture.

    Regional stratification was defined in 37 regions (city and the surrounding business area) throughout Russia.

    Given the stratified design, sample frames containing a complete and updated list of establishments for the selected regions were required. Great efforts were made to obtain the best source for these listings. However, the quality of the sample frames was not optimal and, therefore, some adjustments were needed to correct for the presence of ineligible units. These adjustments are reflected in the weights computation.

    The Centre for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR) at New Economic School was hired to implement the Russia 2012 Enterprise Survey. There were local subcontractors in each of the 37 regions surveyed. The sample frame used for the survey in Russia was from the Ruslana database.

    The enumerated establishments were then used as the frame for the selection of a sample with the aim of obtaining interviews at 4,200 establishments with five or more employees.

    The quality of the frame was assessed at the onset of the project. The frame proved to be useful though it showed positive rates of non-eligibility, repetition, non-existent units, etc. These problems are typical of establishment surveys, but given the impact these inaccuracies may have on the results, adjustments were needed when computing the appropriate weights for individual observations. The percentage of confirmed non-eligible units as a proportion of the total number of sampled establishments contacted for the survey was 38.16% (9,191 out of 24,083 establishments).

    Response Rate

    The number of realized interviews per contacted establishments was 0.56. This number is the result of two factors: explicit refusals to participate in the survey, as reflected by the rate of rejection (which includes rejections of the screener and the main survey) and the quality of the sample frame, as represented by the presence of ineligible units. The number of rejections per contact was 0.56.

    Complete information regarding the sampling methodology, sample frame, weights, response rates, and implementation can be found in "Description of Russia ES Implementation 2012" in Technical Documents.

    Weighting

    For some units it was impossible to determine eligibility because the contact was not successfully completed. Consequently, different assumptions as to their eligibility result in different universe cells' adjustments and in different sampling weights. Three sets of assumptions were considered:

    a- Strict assumption: eligible establishments are only those for which it was possible to directly determine eligibility. The resulting weights are included in the variable wstrict.

    b- Median assumption: eligible establishments are those for which it was possible to directly determine eligibility and those that rejected the screener questionnaire or an answering machine or fax was the only response. The resulting weights are included in the variable wmedian. Median weights are used for computing indicators on the www.enterprisesurveys.org website.

    c- Weak assumption: in addition to the establishments included in points a and b, all establishments for which it was not possible to finalize a contact are assumed eligible. This includes establishments with dead or out of service phone lines, establishments that never answered the phone, and establishments with incorrect addresses for which it was impossible to find a new address. The resulting weights are included in the variable wweak. Note that under the weak assumption only observed non-eligible units are excluded from universe projections.

    Survey instrument

    Questionnaires

    The following survey instruments are available:

    • Core Questionnaire + Manufacturing Module [ISIC Rev.3.1: 15-37]
    • Core Questionnaire + Retail Module [ISIC Rev.3.1: 52]
    • Core Questionnaire [ISIC Rev.3.1: 45, 50, 51, 55, 60-64, 72]
    • Innovation Module - Retail and Core
    • Innovation Module - Manufacturing
    • Screener Questionnaire.

    The "Core Questionnaire" is the heart of the Enterprise Survey and contains the survey questions asked of all firms across the world. There are also two other survey instruments - the "Core Questionnaire + Manufacturing Module" and the "Core Questionnaire + Retail Module." The survey is fielded via three instruments in order to not ask questions that are irrelevant to specific types of firms, e.g. a question that relates to production and nonproduction workers should not be asked of a retail firm. In addition to questions that are asked across countries, all surveys are customized and contain country-specific questions. An example of customization would be including tourism-related questions that are asked in certain countries when tourism is an existing or potential sector of economic growth.

    The standard Enterprise Survey topics include firm characteristics, gender participation, access to finance, annual sales, costs of inputs/labor, workforce composition, bribery, licensing, infrastructure, trade, crime, competition, capacity utilization, land and permits, taxation, informality, business-government relations, innovation and technology, and performance measures. Over 90% of the questions objectively ascertain characteristics of a country's business environment. The remaining questions assess the survey respondents' opinions on what are the obstacles to firm growth and performance.

    The innovation module questionnaires were introduced in 2011. They cover such topics as product, process, marketing and organization innovations, research and development, acquisition of external knowledge and use of computers, protection of innovation, management practices, and interaction with the state and public-private partnerships.

    Data collection

    Dates of Data Collection
    Start End
    2011-08 2012-06
    Data Collectors
    Name Affiliation
    The Centre for Economic and Financial Research New Economic School (NES)
    Supervision

    Complete information regarding the sampling methodology, sample frame, weights, response rates, and implementation can be found in "Description of Russia ES Implementation 2012" in Technical Documents.

    Data Collection Notes

    Private contractors conduct the Enterprise Surveys on behalf of the World Bank. Due to sensitive survey questions addressing business-government relations and corruption-related topics, private contractors are preferred over any government agency or an organization associated with government, and are hired by the World Bank to collect the data.

    The Enterprise Surveys are implemented following a two-stage procedure. In the first stage, a screener questionnaire is applied over the phone to determine eligibility and to make appointments; in the second stage, a face-to-face interview takes place with the Manager/Owner/Director of each establishment. Sometimes the survey respondent calls company accountants and human resource managers into the interview to answer questions in the sales and labor sections of the survey.

    All Enterprise Surveys are conducted in the local languages.

    Complete information regarding the sampling methodology, sample frame, weights, response rates, and implementation can be found in the document "Description of Russia ES Implementation 2012" in Technical Documents.

    Data processing

    Data Editing

    Data entry and quality controls are implemented by the contractor and data is delivered to the World Bank in batches (typically 10%, 50% and 100%). These data deliveries are checked for logical consistency, out of range values, skip patterns, and duplicate entries. Problems are flagged by the World Bank and corrected by the implementing contractor through data checks, callbacks, and revisiting establishments.

    Data Access

    Confidentiality
    Is signing of a confidentiality declaration required? Confidentiality declaration text
    yes Confidentiality of the survey respondents and the sensitive information they provide is necessary to ensure the greatest degree of survey participation, integrity and confidence in the quality of the data. Surveys are usually carried out in cooperation with business organizations and government agencies promoting job creation and economic growth, but confidentiality is never compromised.
    Access conditions

    Aggregate indicators based on Enterprise Survey data are available to the public at http://www.enterprisesurveys.org

    Firm-level data is also available to the public free-of-charge. In order to access the firm-level data, users must agree to abide by a strict confidentiality agreement available through Enterprise Analysis Unit website by clicking on "External users register here" at http://www.enterprisesurveys.org/Portal

    Citation requirements

    The use of this dataset must be acknowledged using a citation which would include:

    • the identification of the Primary Investigator (including country name)
    • the full title of the survey and its acronym (when available), and the year(s) of implementation
    • the survey reference number
    • the source and date of download (for datasets disseminated online)

    Example:

    The World Bank, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Russian Federation Enterprise Survey (ES) 2012, Ref. RUS_2012_ES_v01_M_WB. Dataset downloaded from [URL] on [date].

    Disclaimer and copyrights

    Disclaimer

    The user of the data acknowledges that the original collector of the data, the authorized distributor of the data, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.

    Contacts

    Contacts
    Email
    enterprisesurveys@worldbank.org

    Metadata production

    DDI Document ID

    DDI_RUS_2012_ES_v01_M_WB

    Producers
    Name Affiliation Role
    Development Data Group World Bank DDI Documentation
    Date of Metadata Production

    2012-12-03

    Metadata version

    DDI Document version

    Version 01

    Back to Catalog
    IHSN Survey Catalog

    © IHSN Survey Catalog, All Rights Reserved.