IHSN Survey Catalog
  • Home
  • Microdata Catalog
  • Citations
  • Login
    Login
    Home / Central Data Catalog / WLD_2004_IEP_V01_M
central

Research Database on Infrastructure Economic Performance 1980-2004

Aruba, Afghanistan, Angola...and 190 more, 1980 - 2004
Get Microdata
Reference ID
WLD_2004_IEP_v01_M
Producer(s)
Antonio Estache and Ana Goicoechea
Metadata
DDI/XML JSON
Study website
Created on
Nov 10, 2011
Last modified
Jun 14, 2022
Page views
156347
Downloads
286
  • Study Description
  • Data Dictionary
  • Downloads
  • Get Microdata
  • Related Publications
  • Data files
  • f00
  • f110
  • f121
  • f122
  • f123
  • f130
  • f141
  • f142
  • f150
  • f160
  • f170
  • f211
  • f212
  • f213
  • f221
  • f222
  • f223
  • f230
  • f241
  • f242
  • f243
  • f310
  • f320
  • f330
  • f340
  • f351
  • f352
  • f353
  • f360
  • f370
  • f380
  • f390
  • f410
  • f420
  • f430
  • f440
  • f450
  • f460
  • f470
  • f480
  • f490
  • f3100
  • f3110
  • f3120
  • f3130
  • f3140
  • f4100
  • f4110
  • f4120

Data Dictionary

Data file Cases Variables
f00
List of countries and regions
207 5
f110
Access to Electricity Network (% of population)
207 29
f121
Households Reporting Access to Electricity (% of households)

* Percent distribution of households that have electricity, according to urban-rural residence.
* The data was placed in the latest year when the survey covered 2 calendar years (e.g. Bangladesh 1993/94).
207 29
f122
Rural Households Reporting Access to Electricity (% of rural households)

* Percent distribution of households that have electricity, according to urban-rural residence.
* The data was placed in the latest year when the survey covered 2 calendar years (e.g. Bangladesh 1993/94).
207 29
f123
Urban Households Reporting Access to Electricity (% of urban households)

* Percent distribution of households that have electricity, according to urban-rural residence.
* The data was placed in the latest year when the survey covered 2 calendar years (e.g. Bangladesh 1993/94).
207 29
f130
Energy use per PPP GDP (kg of oil equivalent per constant 2000 PPP 1000$)
207 29
f141
Electricity End-user Prices for Households (US cents/kWh)
207 29
f142
Electricity End-user Prices for Industry (US cents/kWh)

* ERRA prices are for non-residential customers and they were treated as prices for industry
207 29
f150
Commercial Perception of Electricity Service
1=worse than most other countries 7=it is equal to the highest in the world (index based on quality perception)

* Question 6.05 in the 2002 GCR: Rank from 1 to 7 the quality of electricity supply in your country (in terms of lack of interruptions and lack of voltage fluctuations. 1 = it is worse than most other countries. 7 = it is equal to the highest in the world
207 29
f160
Commercial Perception of Public Agency Electricity Provider
1=very bad 7=very good (index based on quality perception)

* Question: How would you rate the quality and efficiency of the following public services? Power
* Rank: 1=very bad. 7=very good.
* The measures presented in the following spreadsheets are derived from the 1999 BEEPS and are subject to a margin of error.
* The direction of the scale was changed to make it comparable to GCR indexes. In the original data 1= very good. For this data 1= very bad. In addition, the data was normalized to base 7.
207 29
f170
Electric Power Transmission and Distribution Losses (% of output)
207 29
f211
Improved water source (% of population with access)

* Caroline van den Berg: even though WHO published data as of 2000, the 2002 data must be considered an update of the 2000, as opposed to an additional year.
* The reason is every data point is estimated through a regression with the data available from different hh surveys. If a new hh survey becomes available, new estimates are calculated using all data available per country.
207 29
f212
Improved water source, rural (% of rural population with access)

* Caroline van den Berg: even though WHO published data as of 2000, the 2002 data must be considered an update of the 2000, as opposed to an additional year.
* The reason is every data point is estimated through a regression with the data available from different hh surveys. If a new hh survey becomes available, new estimates are calculated using all data available per country.
207 29
f213
Improved water source, urban (% of urban population with access)

* Caroline van den Berg: even though WHO published data as of 2000, the 2002 data must be considered an update of the 2000, as opposed to an additional year.
* The reason is every data point is estimated through a regression with the data available from different hh surveys. If a new hh survey becomes available, new estimates are calculated using all data available per country.
207 29
f221
Improved sanitation facilities (% of population with access)

* Caroline van den Berg: even though WHO published data as of 2000, the 2002 data must be considered an update of the 2000, as opposed to an additional year.
* The reason is every data point is estimated through a regression with the data available from different hh surveys. If a new hh survey becomes available, new estimates are calculated using all data available per country.
207 29
f222
Improved sanitation facilities, rural (% of rural population with access)

* Caroline van den Berg: even though WHO published data as of 2000, the 2002 data must be considered an update of the 2000, as opposed to an additional year.
* The reason is every data point is estimated through a regression with the data available from different hh surveys. If a new hh survey becomes available, new estimates are calculated using all data available per country.
207 29
f223
Improved sanitation facilities, urban (% of urban population with access)

* Caroline van den Berg: even though WHO published data as of 2000, the 2002 data must be considered an update of the 2000, as opposed to an additional year.
* The reason is every data point is estimated through a regression with the data available from different hh surveys. If a new hh survey becomes available, new estimates are calculated using all data available per country.
207 29
f230
Commercial Perception of Water Service
1= worst 7=best (index based on quality perception).

* Question: How would you rate the quality and efficiency of the following public services? Water
* Rank: 1=very bad. 7=very good.
* The measures presented in the following spreadsheets are derived from the 1999 BEEPS and are subject to a margin of error.
* The direction and the base of the original scale was changed to make it comparable to GCR indexes. In the original data 6= very bad. For this data 7= very good.
207 29
f241
Households using piped or well water as major source of drinking water, total (% households)

* The data was placed in the latest year when the survey covered 2 calendar years (e.g. Bangladesh 1993/94).
207 29
f242
Households using piped or well water as major source of drinking water, rural (% households)

* The data was placed in the latest year when the survey covered 2 calendar years (e.g. Bangladesh 1993/94).
207 29
f243
Households using piped or well water as major source of drinking water, urban (% households)

* The data was placed in the latest year when the survey covered 2 calendar years (e.g. Bangladesh 1993/94).
207 29
f310
Telephone Subscribers (per 1000 inhabitants)
207 29
f320
Main Telephone Lines Subscribers (per 1000 inhabitants)
207 29
f330
Cellular Telephone Subscribers (per 1000 inhabitants)
207 29
f340
Mainlines per 1000 inhabitants outside largest city
207 29
f351
Households with Own Telephone (% of households)

* The data was placed in the latest year when the survey covered 2 calendar years (e.g. Bangladesh 1999/2000 information was placed in 2000).
207 29
f352
Rural Households with Own Telephone (% of rural households)

* The data was placed in the latest year when the survey covered 2 calendar years (e.g. Bangladesh 1999/2000 information was placed in 2000).
207 29
f353
Urban Households with Own Telephone (% of urban households)
207 29
f360
Cost of Local Phone Call (US¢ per 3 min)
207 29
f370
Cost of Phone Call to the US (US cents per 3 min)
207 29
f380
Cost of Cellular Local Call (US cents per 3 off-peak min)
207 29
f390
Commercial perception of telephone/fax infrastructure quality
1= Scarce and difficult to obtain. 7 = Widely available and highly reliable ( index based on quality perception)

* Question 6.07 in the 2002 GCR: New telephone lines for your business are: 1= Scarce and difficult to obtain. 7 = Widely available and highly reliable.
207 29
f410
Road density, population (road-km/1000 people)
207 29
f420
Road density, land (road-km/1000 sq km)
207 29
f430
Rail density, population (rail-km/1000 people)
207 29
f440
Rail density, land (rail-km/1000 sq km)
207 29
f450
Freight Revenue PPP per ton-km (ICP)
207 29
f460
Passenger Revenue (PPP per pass-km (ICP))
207 29
f470
Travel Time to Work in Main Cities (minutes/one-way work trip)

* In order to aggregate data at the country level we used simple averages of cities' travel time to work, even though the list of cities was not exhaustive.  A more accurate approach, should more data becomes available, would be to use averages weighted b
207 29
f480
Commercial Perception of Services Delivered by the Roads Department/Public Works
1=very bad 7=very good (index based on quality perception)
207 29
f490
Commercial Perception of Port Facilities
1=underdeveloped 7=as developed as the world's best (index based on quality perception)

* Question 4.11 in GCR 1996: Port access infrastructure meets business requirements very well 1 = strongly disagree 6 = strongly agree. Then the scale was converted to a base 7.
* Question 4.05 in GCR 1997: Port facilities and inland waters are extensive and efficient 1 = strongly disagree 7 = strongly agree.
* Question 4.06 in GCR 1999: Port facilities and inland waters are extensive and efficient 1 = strongly disagree 7 = strongly agree.
* Question 5.05 in GCR 2000: Port facilities and inland waters are extensive and efficient 1 = strongly disagree 7 = strongly agree.
* Question 6.03 in GCR 2002: Rank from 1 to 7 port facilities and inland waterways in your country. 1 = underdeveloped. 7 = as developed as the world's best.
207 29
f3100
Commercial perception of availability of mobile or cellular telephone
1= Not available. 7 = As accessible and affordable as in the world's most technologically advance countries (index based on quality perception)

* Question 6.08 in the 2002 GCR: Mobile or cellular telephones for your business are: 1= Not available. 7 = As accessible and affordable as in the world's most technologically advance countries.
207 29
f3110
Commercial perception internet access in schools
1= Very limited. 7 = Pervasive - most children have frequent access (index based on quality perception)

* Question 6.09 in the 2002 GCR: Internet access in schools is: 1= Very limited. 7 = Pervasive - most children have frequent access.
207 29
f3120
Commercial perception of postal efficiency
1 = Not at all. 7 = Yes, trust them entirely (index based on quality perception)

* Question 6.09 in the 2002 GCR: Do you trust your country's postal system sufficiently to have a friend mail a small package worth $100 to you? 1 = Not at all. 7 = Yes, trust them entirely.
207 29
f3130
Phone Faults (reported faults/100 mainlines)
207 29
f3140
Unmet demand (% of main telephone lines in operation)
207 29
f4100
Commercial Perception of Railroad Services
1= underdeveloped 7= as extensive and efficient as the world's best (index based on quality perception)

* Question 6.02 in GCR 2002: Rank from 1 to 7 the railroads in your country. 1 = underdeveloped. 7 = as extensive and efficient as the world's best.
207 29
f4110
Commercial Perception of Air Transport Services
1= infrequent and inefficient 7= as extensive and efficient as the world's best (index based on quality perception)

* Question 6.04 in GCR 2002: Rank from 1 to 7 air transport in your country. 1 = infrequent and inefficient. 7 = as extensive and efficient as the world's best.
207 29
f4120
Paved Roads (% of total roads)
207 29
Back to Catalog
IHSN Survey Catalog

© IHSN Survey Catalog, All Rights Reserved.