IDN_2018_TEIBVF_v01_M
DDI_IDN_2018_TEIBVF_v01_M_WB
Development Economics Data Group
2019-11-11
Nesstar Publisher
Version 01 (November 2019)
Village Law: Technical Evaluation of Infrastructure Built with Village Funds 2018
TEIBVF 2018
IDN_2018_TEIBVF_v01_M
World Bank
Laura Ralston
Kathleen A.Whimp
Ihsan Haerudin
Octaviera Ratna Herawati
Nick Menzies
Vick Bottini
Nil Neate
Su’udi Noor
Saleh Siregar
Ghufron Efendi
Wawan Munawar
Chiaril Latief
Bambang Warsito
Matthew Borden
(c) 2019, The World Bank
2019-11-09
Nesstar Publisher
World Bank IDN TA On Village Transfers (P155783)
Local Solutions to Poverty, Rural Poverty Analytics Team
Social EAP 2
Other Household Health Survey [hh/hea]
Version 2.0: Edited, anonymous dataset for public distribution
This version of the dataset does not include PII found in four variables, including: (1) name of infrastructure project inspector; (2) name or firm of infrastructure project design consultant; (3) narrative description of infrastructure project, in Indonesian; and (4) narrative description of infrastructure project, in English.
Indonesia
This sample includes observations (projects) from the following provinces: Aceh, West Kalimantan, West Java, East Nusa Tenggara, Maluku, West Sulawesi.
Across the datasets, an observation represents one piece of infrastructure located fully within one village according to the Indonesia Statistical Agency (BPS) definition for village. Often more than one piece of infrastructure of the same type within the same village was evaluated.
The population of interest in this survey includes infrastructure projects built using Village Funds in Indonesia.
Sample survey data [ssd]
Su’udi Noor
Saleh Siregar
Ghufron Efendi
Wawan Munawar
Chiaril Latief
Bambang Warsito
Other [oth]
Neil Neate, professional engineer and consultant to the World Bank, led the technical evaluation and supervised the Indonesian rural development engineer team. As the lead engineer, Neal designed the field tools, led testing in the field, and supervised data collection during multiple visits.
Laura Ralston
World Bank Microdata Library
Neil Neate, consultant to the World Bank, Kathy Whimp, Ihsan Haerudin, Nick Menzies, Laura Ralston, Vic Bottini, the World Bank. Technical Evaluation of Infrastructure Built with Village Law - Technical Evaluation Data. Dataset downloaded from [URL] on [date]
Public Use Files (PUFs)
The user of the data acknowledges that the original collector of the data, the authorized distributor of the data, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.
BPS_FT_(0-7)_A_public.NSDstat
33
140
Nesstar 200801
BPS_FT_(0-7)_B_public.NSDstat
15
131
Nesstar 200801
BPS_FT_(0-7)_C_public.NSDstat
14
122
Nesstar 200801
BPS_FT_(0-7)_D_public.NSDstat
94
245
Nesstar 200801
BPS_FT_(0-7)_E_public.NSDstat
12
112
Nesstar 200801
BPS unique village code
33
0
1103060002
2
1103080003
2
1103080016
2
1118010002
4
1118010006
1
1118040015
2
3203150004
1
5302052016
1
5312010019
1
5312010020
2
5312080008
1
5312080017
1
6110020012
3
6110070010
2
6110070014
1
7602051003
1
7602051005
1
8109020017
1
8109020029
1
8109030016
1
8109030017
2
Type of infrastructure
33
0
A
33
Village level identifying infrastructure number
33
0
A
12
A1
9
A2
9
A3
2
A4
1
Unique infrastructure number
33
0
1103060002A1
1
1103060002A2
1
1103080003A1
1
1103080003A2
1
1103080016A1
1
1103080016A2
1
1118010002A1
1
1118010002A2
1
1118010002A3
1
1118010002A4
1
1118010006A
1
1118040015A1
1
1118040015A2
1
3203150004A
1
5302052016A
1
5312010019A
1
5312010020A1
1
5312010020A2
1
5312080008A
1
5312080017A
1
6110020012A1
1
6110020012A2
1
6110020012A3
1
6110070010A1
1
6110070010A2
1
6110070014A
1
7602051003A
1
7602051005A
1
8109020017A
1
8109020029A
1
8109030016A
1
8109030017A1
1
8109030017A2
1
Year of infrastructure construction
33
0
2015
2017
2015
9
2016
10
2017
14
Type of infrastructure construction
33
0
1
2
1
New Construction
29
2
Rehabilitation
4
Modality of infrastructure construction
33
0
1
3
1
Swakelola
31
2
Contractor
0
3
Joint
2
Number of households benefitting from infrastructure construction
33
0
0
451
Number of beneficiaries benefitting from infrastructure construction
33
0
0
1788
Remote/not remote status of infrastructure construction location, by village
33
0
1
2
1
Remote
10
2
Not Remote
23
Date of infrastructure construction inspection
33
2018-04-07
2018-12-07
2018-04-07
2
2018-06-06
1
2018-07-03
1
2018-07-04
1
2018-07-05
2
2018-07-06
3
2018-07-07
2
2018-07-09
1
2018-07-13
3
2018-08-07
1
2018-08-08
4
2018-08-09
2
2018-08-10
1
2018-08-11
2
2018-08-13
2
2018-11-07
3
2018-11-08
1
2018-12-07
1
Foundation, evaluation result
33
0
1
4
1
Meets specifications
23
2
Slightly below specifications
5
3
Below specifications
0
4
Not inspected
5
5
Not applicable
0
Ground beam/plinth beam, evaluation result
33
0
1
4
1
Meets specifications
20
2
Slightly below specifications
10
3
Below specifications
0
4
Not inspected
3
5
Not applicable
0
Wall, evaluation result
33
0
1
3
1
Meets specifications
13
2
Slightly below specifications
18
3
Below specifications
2
4
Not inspected
0
5
Not applicable
0
Column, evaluation result
33
0
1
4
1
Meets specifications
20
2
Slightly below specifications
6
3
Below specifications
4
4
Not inspected
3
5
Not applicable
0
Ring beam, evaluation result
33
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
13
2
Slightly below specifications
10
3
Below specifications
3
4
Not inspected
5
5
Not applicable
2
Truss construction assembly and components, evaluation result
33
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
7
2
Slightly below specifications
9
3
Below specifications
0
4
Not inspected
11
5
Not applicable
6
Truss connection to ring beam, evaluation result
33
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
9
2
Slightly below specifications
5
3
Below specifications
2
4
Not inspected
12
5
Not applicable
5
Roof materials, evaluation result
33
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
20
2
Slightly below specifications
11
3
Below specifications
0
4
Not inspected
1
5
Not applicable
1
Roof connections to purlin, evaluation result
33
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
6
2
Slightly below specifications
4
3
Below specifications
3
4
Not inspected
13
5
Not applicable
7
Floor, evaluation result
33
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
18
2
Slightly below specifications
10
3
Below specifications
2
4
Not inspected
2
5
Not applicable
1
Plastering, evaluation result
33
0
1
3
1
Meets specifications
12
2
Slightly below specifications
18
3
Below specifications
3
4
Not inspected
0
5
Not applicable
0
Ceiling, evaluation result
33
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
14
2
Slightly below specifications
15
3
Below specifications
2
4
Not inspected
0
5
Not applicable
2
Painting, evaluation result
33
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
9
2
Slightly below specifications
17
3
Below specifications
5
4
Not inspected
0
5
Not applicable
2
Doors and windows, evaluation result
33
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
15
2
Slightly below specifications
12
3
Below specifications
5
4
Not inspected
0
5
Not applicable
1
Toilet, evaluation result
33
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
7
2
Slightly below specifications
8
3
Below specifications
8
4
Not inspected
1
5
Not applicable
9
Septic tank, evaluation result
33
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
4
2
Slightly below specifications
3
3
Below specifications
8
4
Not inspected
3
5
Not applicable
15
Ramp and handrail, evaluation result
33
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
3
2
Slightly below specifications
7
3
Below specifications
2
4
Not inspected
0
5
Not applicable
21
Water utilities, evaluation result
33
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
12
2
Slightly below specifications
2
3
Below specifications
5
4
Not inspected
1
5
Not applicable
13
Electrical installation, evaluation result
33
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
17
2
Slightly below specifications
9
3
Below specifications
3
4
Not inspected
1
5
Not applicable
3
Drainage, evaluation result
33
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
6
2
Slightly below specifications
2
3
Below specifications
10
4
Not inspected
1
5
Not applicable
14
Other structures, evaluation result
33
0
2
5
1
Meets specifications
0
2
Slightly below specifications
2
3
Below specifications
0
4
Not inspected
2
5
Not applicable
29
Operation and maintenance, evaluation result
33
0
2
5
1
Meets specifications
0
2
Slightly below specifications
7
3
Below specifications
18
4
Not inspected
2
5
Not applicable
6
Construction quality, assessment
33
0
1
6
1
Highly satisfactory
3
2
Satisfactory
11
3
Moderately satisfactory
12
4
Highly unsatisfactory
4
5
Unsatisfactory
2
6
Highly unsatisfactory
1
Design completeness, assessment
33
0
1
3
1
Good
7
2
Average
15
3
Poor
11
Functionality, assessment
33
0
1
4
1
High
11
2
Average
17
3
Low
3
4
None
2
Adequacy of design consultation with users
33
0
0
1
0
No
9
1
Yes
24
File completeness (meeting notes, land donation records, design drawings, etc.
33
0
1
3
1
Yes
10
2
No
18
3
Not Available
5
Kabupaten engineer and TF inspection notes to file
33
0
1
3
1
Yes
1
2
No
30
3
Not Available
2
Final sub-project inspection report, in file and fully completed
33
0
2
3
1
Yes
0
2
No
27
3
Not Available
6
As-built drawing
33
0
2
3
1
Yes
0
2
No
27
3
Not Available
6
Quality of technical facilitation
33
0
2
3
1
Good
0
2
Average
14
3
Poor
19
Frequency of TF site visits (number of visits)
33
0
.
2
0
15
2
4
3
3
4
3
5
1
6
4
7
1
Construction period (in months)
33
0
.
2
0
10
1
1
12
1
2
2
3
11
4
3
5
3
Environmental Practices (site inspection confirms appropriate...), assessment
33
0
0
1
0
No
15
1
Yes
18
3
Not applicable
0
Land Acquisition (site inspection confirms appropriate...), assessment
33
0
0
1
0
No
32
1
Yes
1
3
Not applicable
0
Social Safegaurds (site inspection confirms appropriate...), assessment
33
0
0
1
0
No
24
1
Yes
9
3
Not applicable
0
Building Dimensions (width), in m
32
1
2.6
40
Building Dimensions (length), in m
31
2
1.6
18
Building Dimensions (area), in square meters
31
2
4.528
280
Number of rooms
33
0
.
2
0
9
1
3
2
7
3
5
4
5
5
2
Building Structure (contains reinforced concrete)
33
0
.
2
0
7
1
24
Building Structure (contains wood)
33
0
.
2
0
25
1
6
Building Structure (contains steel)
33
0
.
2
0
31
Trusswork (contains wood)
33
0
.
2
0
10
1
21
Trusswork (contains steel)
33
0
.
2
0
28
1
3
Building Cost (budget), in IDR
33
0
33988000
317224000
Building Cost (actual), in IDR / square meter
33
0
.
3
1022285.714285714
1
1035832.435714286
1
1062500
1
1170739.526411657
1
1192460.317460317
1
1228419.388830348
1
1327739.583333333
1
1337122.666666667
1
1416178.571428571
1
1618476.190476191
1
2161195.007262164
1
2178717.948717949
1
2357142.857142857
1
2500028.125
1
2687228.571428571
1
2698412.698412698
1
2916666.666666667
1
3011277.777777778
1
3203958.333333333
1
3253577.380952381
1
3303776.321294101
1
3333333.333333333
1
3421056.203605515
1
3816611.111111111
1
4413556.836039811
1
4414414.414414414
1
4970714.285714285
1
612158.8391012396
1
785220.8161157024
1
982780.198019802
1
Building Cost (standard unit, from Kabupaten records), in IDR / square meter
33
0
.
8
1300993
1
1328483.78
3
2084222.07697894
1
2318821.42
1
2348164.71
1
2500000
1
2508899
1
2600000
3
2665056.69
1
2781538.11
1
2805959.761904762
1
2809996.78
1
2900000
3
3208618.8258
1
4668470.2462
1
4897959.7857
1
610860
1
786035.9568698346
1
909124.4198019801
1
Major repairs or rehabilitation performed
33
0
0
1
0
32
1
1
Major repairs or rehabilitation required
33
0
0
1
0
30
1
3
Cause of Damage, environmental
33
0
0
0
0
33
Cause of Damage, poor design
33
0
0
1
0
32
1
1
Cause of Damage, poor construction
33
0
0
1
0
32
1
1
Cause of Damage, materials
33
0
0
1
0
32
1
1
Cause of Damage, poor operations & maintanence
33
0
0
1
0
32
1
1
Repair Costs (actual)
33
0
.
2
121615000
1
N/A
30
Repair Costs (estimated)
33
0
.
3
N/A
30
Repair performed by
33
0
.
2
N/A
30
Village labour
1
Repair date
33
0
.
2
6/1/2016
1
N/A
30
Routine Maintenance (roof repair)
33
0
0
0
0
33
Routine Maintenance (mechanical
33
0
0
0
0
33
Routine Maintenance (plumbing repair)
33
0
0
0
0
33
Routine Maintenance (concrete repair)
33
0
0
0
0
33
Routine Maintenance (plaster repair)
33
0
0
0
0
33
Routine Maintenance (washing)
33
0
0
1
0
26
1
7
Routine Maintenance (painting)
33
0
0
0
0
33
Routine Maintenance (drainage)
33
0
0
0
0
33
Operation and Maintanence Plan (has a multi-year plan)
33
0
.
33
Operation and Maintanence Plan (linked to line ministries)
33
0
.
33
Operation and Maintanence Plan (has clear division of responsibilities and costs
33
0
.
33
Operation and Maintanence Plan (contains estimated costs, routine)
33
0
.
33
Operation and Maintanence Plan (contains estimated costs, capital repairs)
33
0
.
33
Operation and Maintanence Committee (in place and functioning)
33
0
.
33
Operation and Maintanence Committee (user fee in place)
33
0
.
33
Operation and Maintanence Committee (user fee for specified services)
33
0
.
33
Operation and Maintanence Committee (contributions from other sources)
33
0
.
33
Operation and Maintanence Committee (current funds within operation and maintane
33
0
.
33
Operation and Maintanence Committee (affordibility of user fees)
33
0
.
33
Operation and Maintanence Committee (government inputs to schools and medical cl
33
0
.
33
Operation and Maintanence Committee (labor and material input from community)
33
0
.
33
Operation and Maintanence Committee (labor and material input from government)
33
0
.
33
Operation and Maintanence Training (O&M training received)
33
0
.
33
Operation and Maintanence Training (ongoing capacity development)
33
0
.
33
Operation and Maintanence Training (annual training budget)
33
0
.
33
Climate Resiliency (safe from flooding)
33
0
0
1
0
8
1
25
Climate Resiliency (erosion protection measures are sufficient)
33
0
0
1
0
9
1
24
Climate Resiliency (low landslide risk; no steep slopes)
33
0
0
1
0
6
1
27
Climate Resiliency (low forest fire risk; clear area between building and forest
33
0
0
1
0
7
1
26
Issue Design (lack of construction details on drawings)
33
0
0
1
0
13
1
20
Issue Design (inaccurate drawings of connection details)
33
0
0
1
0
18
1
15
Issue Design (improper wood column design)
33
0
0
1
0
32
1
1
Issue Design (constructed dimensions differ from plan)
33
0
0
1
0
28
1
5
Issue Roof / Truss (inadequate overlap of roof sheeting)
33
0
0
0
0
33
Issue Roof / Truss (improper connection of roof to truss (no cleat, etc.))
33
0
0
1
0
31
1
2
Issue Roof / Truss (unreinforced splices in truss members)
33
0
0
0
0
33
Issue Roof / Truss (missing steel strapping)
33
0
0
0
0
33
Issue Roof / Truss (use of nails rather than bolts)
33
0
0
1
0
26
1
7
Issue Roof / Truss (undersized/missing truss members)
33
0
0
0
0
33
Issue Roof / Truss (improper connection of truss to ring beam)
33
0
0
1
0
28
1
5
Issue Steel (short development length in steel reinforcing)
33
0
0
1
0
31
1
2
Issue Steel (improperly bent reinforcing cage stirrups)
33
0
0
1
0
32
1
1
Issue Steel (lack of tie bar wiring)
33
0
0
1
0
32
1
1
Issue Steel (missing anchors, foundation to ground beam)
33
0
0
1
0
32
1
1
Issue Steel (missing anchors, column to wall)
33
0
0
1
0
28
1
5
Issue Concrete / Plaster (absence of concrete mix design)
33
0
0
1
0
19
1
14
Issue Concrete / Plaster (honeycombing in concrete)
33
0
0
1
0
22
1
11
Issue Concrete / Plaster (exposed/shallow reinforcing steel)
33
0
0
1
0
31
1
2
Issue Concrete / Plaster (improper materials or poorly mixed concrete)
33
0
0
1
0
23
1
10
Issue Concrete / Plaster (undersized concrete column/beam)
33
0
0
1
0
31
1
2
Issue Concrete / Plaster (improper plastering technique)
33
0
0
1
0
21
1
12
Issue Concrete / Plaster (poor plastering and finishing)
33
0
0
1
0
22
1
11
Issue Sanitary Facilities (toilet building not provided)
33
0
0
1
0
27
1
6
Issue Sanitary Facilities (no water connection to public system)
33
0
0
1
0
24
1
9
Issue Sanitary Facilities (poor drainage/ponding on floor)
33
0
0
1
0
30
1
3
Issue Sanitary Facilities (exposed PVC pipe)
33
0
0
1
0
28
1
5
Issue Sanitary Facilities (no access lid to septic tank)
33
0
0
1
0
26
1
7
Issue Sanitary Facilities (high watertable in septic tank)
33
0
0
0
0
33
Issue Electric (no junction box at wiring connections)
33
0
0
1
0
32
1
1
Issue Electric (low/unattached wiring in public area)
33
0
0
0
0
33
Issue Electric (broken switch)
33
0
0
1
0
30
1
3
Issue Electric (wiring installed but not energized)
33
0
0
1
0
30
1
3
Issue Miscelaneous (broken mechanical fixtures)
33
0
0
1
0
27
1
6
Issue Miscelaneous (no handicap ramp/too steep)
33
0
0
1
0
31
1
2
Issue Miscelaneous (ponding on the floor)
33
0
0
1
0
32
1
1
Issue Miscelaneous (poor drainage around building)
33
0
0
1
0
21
1
12
Did the process of infrastructure prioritization within the village follow Villa
33
0
1
4
1
Fully met requirements
7
2
Somewhat met requirements
18
3
Did not meet requirements
4
4
No Data
4
Did the procurement process (either swakelola or contractor) follow all laws and
33
0
2
4
1
Fully complied with laws
0
2
Somewhat complied with laws
22
3
Did not comply with laws
6
4
No Data
5
How many persons have been participating in these meetings and how effective are
33
0
1
5
1
Highly Effective (lots of participation)
2
2
Effective (some participation)
10
3
Moderately Effective (limited participation)
8
4
Ineffective (little participation)
9
5
No Data
4
Women's participation in prioritization, procurement and community meetings
33
0
2
5
1
Highly Effective (lots of participation, >50%)
0
2
Effective (some participation, about 50%)
8
3
Moderately Effective (limited participation, <25%)
8
4
Ineffective (little participation, <10%)
13
5
No Data
4
BPS unique village code
15
0
1103060002
1
1103060003
1
1118010006
1
3203150003
1
5302052019
1
5312080008
1
6110020012
2
6110070014
1
7602051003
1
7602051005
1
7602061001
2
7602061004
1
8109020008
1
Type of infrastructure
15
0
B
15
Village level identifying infrastructure number
15
0
B
11
B1
2
B2
2
Unique infrastructure number
15
0
1103060002B
1
1103060003B
1
1118010006B
1
3203150003B
1
5302052019B
1
5312080008B
1
6110020012B1
1
6110020012B2
1
6110070014B
1
7602051003B
1
7602051005B
1
7602061001B1
1
7602061001B2
1
7602061004B
1
8109020008B
1
Year of infrastructure construction
15
0
2016
2061
2019.4
11.519
Type of infrastructure construction
15
0
1
2
1
New Construction
14
2
Rehabilitation
1
Modality of infrastructure construction
15
0
1
1
1
Swakelola
15
2
Contractor
0
3
Joint
0
Number of households benefitting from infrastructure construction
15
0
40
1300
289.4
409.252
Number of beneficiaries benefitting from infrastructure construction
15
0
137
5766
1187.6
1772.162
Remote/not remote status of infrastructure construction location, by village
15
0
1
2
1
Remote
8
2
Not Remote
7
Date of infrastructure construction inspection
15
2015-07-04
2018-12-07
2015-07-04
1
2018-06-06
1
2018-07-03
1
2018-07-05
1
2018-07-10
1
2018-08-07
1
2018-08-08
1
2018-08-09
1
2018-08-10
4
2018-08-11
1
2018-09-08
1
2018-12-07
1
Layout, evaluation result
15
0
1
3
1
Meets specifications
11
2
Slightly below specifications
2
3
Below specifications
2
4
Not inspected
0
5
Not applicable
0
Foundation, evaluation result
15
0
1
2
1
Meets specifications
9
2
Slightly below specifications
6
3
Below specifications
0
4
Not inspected
0
5
Not applicable
0
Erosion protection, evaluation result
15
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
4
2
Slightly below specifications
7
3
Below specifications
2
4
Not inspected
0
5
Not applicable
2
Abutments, evaluation result
15
0
1
2
1
Meets specifications
8
2
Slightly below specifications
7
3
Below specifications
0
4
Not inspected
0
5
Not applicable
0
Piers/supports, evaluation result
15
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
4
2
Slightly below specifications
2
3
Below specifications
1
4
Not inspected
0
5
Not applicable
8
Wingalls, evaluation result
15
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
5
2
Slightly below specifications
7
3
Below specifications
2
4
Not inspected
0
5
Not applicable
1
Concrete, evaluation result
15
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
9
2
Slightly below specifications
4
3
Below specifications
0
4
Not inspected
0
5
Not applicable
2
Deck beams, evaluation result
15
0
1
4
1
Meets specifications
10
2
Slightly below specifications
2
3
Below specifications
2
4
Not inspected
1
5
Not applicable
0
Deck, evaluation result
15
0
1
2
1
Meets specifications
11
2
Slightly below specifications
4
3
Below specifications
0
4
Not inspected
0
5
Not applicable
0
Submerged concrete laneway, evaluation result
15
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
2
2
Slightly below specifications
3
3
Below specifications
0
4
Not inspected
3
5
Not applicable
7
Handrail, evaluation result
15
0
1
2
1
Meets specifications
12
2
Slightly below specifications
3
3
Below specifications
0
4
Not inspected
0
5
Not applicable
0
Connections (nails, bolts), evaluation result
15
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
3
2
Slightly below specifications
1
3
Below specifications
0
4
Not inspected
5
5
Not applicable
6
Apron / ramp / access to road, evaluation result
15
0
1
3
1
Meets specifications
5
2
Slightly below specifications
5
3
Below specifications
5
4
Not inspected
0
5
Not applicable
0
Other structures, evaluation result
15
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
2
2
Slightly below specifications
6
3
Below specifications
0
4
Not inspected
0
5
Not applicable
7
Operation and maintenance, evaluation result
15
0
3
5
1
Meets specifications
0
2
Slightly below specifications
0
3
Below specifications
6
4
Not inspected
0
5
Not applicable
9
Construction quality, assessment
15
0
1
5
1
Highly satisfactory
4
2
Satisfactory
5
3
Moderately satisfactory
3
4
Highly unsatisfactory
2
5
Unsatisfactory
1
6
Highly unsatisfactory
0
Design completeness, assessment
15
0
1
3
1
Good
3
2
Average
7
3
Poor
5
Functionality, assessment
15
0
1
4
1
High
8
2
Average
4
3
Low
1
4
None
2
Adequacy of design consultation with users
15
0
0
1
0
No
4
1
Yes
11
File completeness (meeting notes, land donation records, design drawings, etc.
15
0
1
3
1
Yes
8
2
No
4
3
Not Available
3
Kabupaten engineer and TF inspection notes to file
15
0
1
3
1
Yes
2
2
No
12
3
Not Available
1
Final sub-project inspection report, in file and fully completed
15
0
1
3
1
Yes
1
2
No
12
3
Not Available
2
As-built drawing
15
0
1
3
1
Yes
3
2
No
10
3
Not Available
2
Quality of technical facilitation
15
0
1
3
1
Good
1
2
Average
9
3
Poor
5
Frequency of TF site visits (number of visits)
15
0
0
5
2.267
1.792
0
5
2
1
3
5
4
3
5
1
Construction period (in months)
15
0
0
12
4.6
3.397
0
1
2
2
3
5
4
1
5
2
6
2
12
2
Environmental Practices (site inspection confirms appropriate...), assessment
15
0
0
1
0
No
5
1
Yes
10
3
Not applicable
0
Land Acquisition (site inspection confirms appropriate...), assessment
15
0
0
3
0
No
8
1
Yes
0
3
Not applicable
7
Social Safegaurds (site inspection confirms appropriate...), assessment
15
0
0
1
0
No
9
1
Yes
6
3
Not applicable
0
Bridge Dimensions (length), in m
15
0
.
1
10
1
14
1
38.2
1
4
2
4.05
1
4.6
1
4.65
1
5
1
6
1
6.2
1
6.6
1
7
2
Bridge Dimensions (width), in m
15
0
.
1
1.6
1
1.8
1
2
1
3.15
1
3.9
1
4
5
4.2
1
4.7
1
5
1
6.8
1
Bridge Dimensions (area), in square meters
15
0
.
1
12
1
14.49
1
16
2
18
1
18.6
1
19.035
1
21
1
24.8
1
25.74
1
35
1
47.6
1
56
1
61.12
1
Bridge Deck (contains reinforced concrete)
15
0
0
1
0.733
0.458
0
4
1
11
Bridge Deck (contains wood)
15
0
0
1
0.267
0.458
0
11
1
4
Bridge Deck (contains steel)
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
Beams (contains reinforced concrete)
15
0
0
1
0.667
0.488
0
5
1
10
Beams (contains wood)
15
0
0
1
0.267
0.458
0
11
1
4
Beams (contains steel)
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
Columns (contain reinforced concrete)
15
0
0
1
0.267
0.458
0
11
1
4
Columns (contain wood)
15
0
0
1
0.2
0.414
0
12
1
3
Columns (contain masonry)
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
Columns (contain steel)
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
Abutments (contain reinforced concrete)
15
0
0
1
0.0667
0.258
0
14
1
1
Abutments (contain wood)
15
0
0
1
0.0667
0.258
0
14
1
1
Abutments (contain masonry)
15
0
0
1
0.733
0.458
0
4
1
11
Rainings (contain reinforced concrete)
15
0
0
1
0.133
0.352
0
13
1
2
Rainings (contain wood)
15
0
0
1
0.2
0.414
0
12
1
3
Rainings (contain steel)
15
0
0
1
0.733
0.458
0
4
1
11
Bridge Cost (budget), in IDR
15
0
.
1
188860000
1
196635000
1
20000000
1
242966000
1
263190000
1
307776000
1
34748500
1
37380312
1
61881000
1
66547000
1
70275058
1
94259100
1
97770000
1
98186037
1
Bridge Cost (actual), in IDR / square meter
15
0
.
1
10153763.44086021
1
1111111.111111111
1
1398046.218487395
1
16767839.88957902
1
1753322.089285714
1
1780014.857142857
1
2895708.333333333
1
3867562.5
1
3942338.709677419
1
4392191.125
1
4951883.372734437
1
5035602.094240838
1
7519714.285714285
1
7639277.38927739
1
Bridge Cost (standard unit, from Kabupaten records), in IDR / square meter
15
0
.
7
1662821.428571429
1
16867887.509
1
2870541.667
1
3704412
1
4245355
1
4888398.249345549
1
5011842.500656685
1
6780300
1
Major repairs or rehabilitation performed
15
0
0
1
0.0667
0.258
0
14
1
1
Major repairs or rehabilitation required
15
0
0
1
0.0667
0.258
0
14
1
1
Cause of Damage, environmental
15
0
.
1
0
14
Cause of Damage, poor design
15
0
.
1
0
14
Cause of Damage, poor construction
15
0
.
1
0
14
Cause of Damage, materials
15
0
.
1
0
14
Cause of Damage, poor operations & maintanence
15
0
.
1
0
14
Repair Costs (actual)
15
0
.
1
N/A
14
Repair Costs (estimated)
15
0
.
1
N/A
14
Repair performed by
15
0
.
1
N/A
14
Repair date
15
0
.
1
N/A
14
Routine Maintenance (deck repair)
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
Routine Maintenance (concrete repair)
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
Routine Maintenance (drainage)
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
Routine Maintenance (apron and road repair)
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
Routine Maintenance (support structure)
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
Routine Maintenance (railings)
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
Routine Maintenance (erosion protection)
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
Routine Maintenance (other)
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
Operation and Maintanence Plan (has a multi-year plan)
15
0
.
15
Operation and Maintanence Plan (linked to line ministries)
15
0
.
15
Operation and Maintanence Plan (has clear division of responsibilities and costs
15
0
.
15
Operation and Maintanence Plan (contains estimated costs, routine)
15
0
.
15
Operation and Maintanence Plan (contains estimated costs, capital repairs)
15
0
.
15
Operation and Maintanence Committee (in place and functioning)
15
0
.
15
Operation and Maintanence Committee (user fee in place)
15
0
.
15
Operation and Maintanence Committee (user fee for specified services)
15
0
.
15
Operation and Maintanence Committee (contributions from other sources)
15
0
.
15
Operation and Maintanence Committee (current funds within operation and maintane
15
0
.
15
Operation and Maintanence Committee (affordibility of user fees)
15
0
.
15
Operation and Maintanence Committee (government inputs to schools and medical cl
15
0
.
15
Operation and Maintanence Committee (labor and material input from community)
15
0
.
15
Operation and Maintanence Committee (labor and material input from government)
15
0
.
15
Operation and Maintanence Training (O&M training received)
15
0
.
15
Operation and Maintanence Training (ongoing capacity development)
15
0
.
15
Operation and Maintanence Training (annual training budget)
15
0
.
15
Climate Resiliency (safe from flooding)
15
0
.
1
0
2
1
12
Climate Resiliency (erosion protection measures are sufficient)
15
0
.
1
0
4
1
10
Climate Resiliency (low landslide risk; no steep slopes)
15
0
.
1
1
14
Climate Resiliency (low forest fire risk; clear area between building and forest
15
0
.
1
0
2
1
12
Issue Design (lack of construction details on drawings)
15
0
0
1
0.4
0.507
0
9
1
6
Issue Design (inaccurate drawings of connection details)
15
0
0
1
0.267
0.458
0
11
1
4
Issue Design (improper steel reinforcement design)
15
0
0
1
0.0667
0.258
0
14
1
1
Issue Design (constructed dimensions differ from plan)
15
0
0
1
0.333
0.488
0
10
1
5
Issue Layout (poor site selection)
15
0
0
1
0.0667
0.258
0
14
1
1
Issue Layout (inadequate erosion protection)
15
0
0
1
0.2
0.414
0
12
1
3
Issue Layout (inadequate depth of foundation)
15
0
0
1
0.0667
0.258
0
14
1
1
Issue Layout (pier location subject to erosive forces)
15
0
0
1
0.133
0.352
0
13
1
2
Issue Layout (abutment and wingwall design)
15
0
0
1
0.0667
0.258
0
14
1
1
Issue Steel Reinforcement (short development length in steel reinforcing)
15
0
0
1
0.0667
0.258
0
14
1
1
Issue Steel Reinforcement (improperly bent reinforcing cage stirrup bars)
15
0
0
1
0.0667
0.258
0
14
1
1
Issue Steel Reinforcement (lack of tie bar wiring)
15
0
0
1
0.0667
0.258
0
14
1
1
Issue Steel Reinforcement (missing anchors, foundation to deck beam)
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
Issue Steel Reinforcement (Missing anchors, column to deck)
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
Issue Concrete (absence of concrete mix design)
15
0
0
1
0.4
0.507
0
9
1
6
Issue Concrete (honeycombing in concrete)
15
0
0
1
0.2
0.414
0
12
1
3
Issue Concrete (exposed/shallow reinforcing steel)
15
0
0
1
0.2
0.414
0
12
1
3
Issue Concrete (improper materials or poorly mixed concrete)
15
0
0
1
0.2
0.414
0
12
1
3
Issue Concrete (undersized concrete column/beam)
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
Issue Wood (inadequate structural design)
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
Issue Wood (lack of bolted connections)
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
Issue Wood (inadequate deck and running boards)
15
0
0
1
0.0667
0.258
0
14
1
1
Issue Miscellaneous (inadequate railings and connections)
15
0
0
1
0.133
0.352
0
13
1
2
Issue Miscellaneous (inadequate apron and ramp)
15
0
0
1
0.467
0.516
0
8
1
7
Issue Miscellaneous (inadequate drainage)
15
0
0
1
0.333
0.488
0
10
1
5
Did the process of infrastructure prioritization within the village follow Villa
15
0
1
3
1
Fully met requirements
3
2
Somewhat met requirements
10
3
Did not meet requirements
2
Did the procurement process (either swakelola or contractor) follow all laws and
15
0
1
3
1
Fully complied with laws
3
2
Somewhat complied with laws
10
3
Did not comply with laws
2
How many persons have been participating in these meetings and how effective are
15
0
2
4
1
Highly Effective (lots of participation)
0
2
Effective (some participation)
1
3
Moderately Effective (limited participation)
8
4
Ineffective (little participation)
6
Women's participation in prioritization, procurement and community meetings
15
0
2
4
1
Highly Effective (lots of participation, >50%)
0
2
Effective (some participation, about 50%)
2
3
Moderately Effective (limited participation, <25%)
6
4
Ineffective (little participation, <10%)
7
BPS unique village code
14
0
1103060002
1
1103080003
2
5302052016
1
5312010019
1
6110020012
1
6110070010
1
7602061001
1
8109020017
3
8109030006
1
8109030009
1
8109030016
1
Type of infrastructure
14
0
C
14
Village level identifying infrastructure number
14
0
C
9
C1
2
C2
2
C3
1
Unique infrastructure number
14
0
1103060002C
1
1103080003C1
1
1103080003C2
1
5302052016C
1
5312010019C
1
6110020012C
1
6110070010C
1
7602061001C
1
8109020017C1
1
8109020017C2
1
8109020017C3
1
8109030006C
1
8109030009C
1
8109030016C
1
Year of infrastructure construction
14
0
2015
2017
2015
4
2016
3
2017
7
Type of infrastructure construction
14
0
1
2
1
New Construction
7
2
Rehabilitation
7
Modality of infrastructure construction
14
0
1
3
1
Swakelola
12
2
Contractor
1
3
Joint
1
Number of households benefitting from infrastructure construction
14
0
24
172
Number of beneficiaries benefitting from infrastructure construction
14
0
0
713
Remote/not remote status of infrastructure construction location, by village
14
0
1
2
1
Remote
11
2
Not Remote
3
Date of infrastructure construction inspection
14
2018-07-04
2108-08-11
2018-07-04
1
2018-07-06
1
2018-07-07
2
2018-07-11
1
2018-08-08
3
2018-08-11
1
2018-08-13
1
2018-11-08
3
2108-08-11
1
Water source (smell and color), evaluation result
14
0
1
4
1
Meets specifications
13
2
Slightly below specifications
0
3
Below specifications
0
4
Not inspected
1
5
Not applicable
0
Water source (chemical analysis), evaluation result
14
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
4
2
Slightly below specifications
0
3
Below specifications
0
4
Not inspected
0
5
Not applicable
10
Water source (watershed protection), evaluation result
14
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
2
2
Slightly below specifications
5
3
Below specifications
0
4
Not inspected
3
5
Not applicable
4
Water system design, evaluation result
14
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
1
2
Slightly below specifications
2
3
Below specifications
10
4
Not inspected
0
5
Not applicable
1
Borehole and pump system, evaluation result
14
0
3
5
1
Meets specifications
0
2
Slightly below specifications
0
3
Below specifications
2
4
Not inspected
0
5
Not applicable
12
Resevoir (structural integrety), evaluation result
14
0
2
5
1
Meets specifications
0
2
Slightly below specifications
7
3
Below specifications
2
4
Not inspected
3
5
Not applicable
2
Resevoir (ease of cleaning), evaluation result
14
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
2
2
Slightly below specifications
3
3
Below specifications
2
4
Not inspected
3
5
Not applicable
4
Transmission and distribution pipe (proper installation), evaluation result
14
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
2
2
Slightly below specifications
5
3
Below specifications
6
4
Not inspected
0
5
Not applicable
1
Public Taps (number and location), evaluation result
14
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
3
2
Slightly below specifications
3
3
Below specifications
2
4
Not inspected
1
5
Not applicable
5
Public Taps (fixtures), evaluation result
14
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
2
2
Slightly below specifications
2
3
Below specifications
3
4
Not inspected
1
5
Not applicable
6
Public Taps (platforms), evaluation result
14
0
2
5
1
Meets specifications
0
2
Slightly below specifications
3
3
Below specifications
3
4
Not inspected
1
5
Not applicable
7
Water pressure and quality, evaluation result
14
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
9
2
Slightly below specifications
1
3
Below specifications
3
4
Not inspected
0
5
Not applicable
1
Other structures, evaluation result
14
0
2
5
1
Meets specifications
0
2
Slightly below specifications
3
3
Below specifications
1
4
Not inspected
1
5
Not applicable
9
Operation and maintenance, evaluation result
14
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
3
2
Slightly below specifications
2
3
Below specifications
7
4
Not inspected
1
5
Not applicable
1
Construction quality, assessment
14
0
2
6
1
Highly satisfactory
0
2
Satisfactory
3
3
Moderately satisfactory
2
4
Highly unsatisfactory
4
5
Unsatisfactory
4
6
Highly unsatisfactory
1
Design completeness, assessment
14
0
0
3
0
1
1
Good
0
2
Average
4
3
Poor
9
Functionality, assessment
14
0
1
4
1
High
5
2
Average
7
3
Low
1
4
None
1
Adequacy of design consultation with users
14
0
0
1
0
No
1
1
Yes
13
File completeness (meeting notes, land donation records, design drawings, etc.
14
0
1
3
1
Yes
4
2
No
8
3
Not Available
2
Kabupaten engineer and TF inspection notes to file
14
0
2
3
1
Yes
0
2
No
13
3
Not Available
1
Final sub-project inspection report, in file and fully completed
14
0
2
3
1
Yes
0
2
No
13
3
Not Available
1
As-built drawing
14
0
1
3
1
Yes
1
2
No
12
3
Not Available
1
Quality of technical facilitation
14
0
2
3
1
Good
0
2
Average
3
3
Poor
11
Frequency of TF site visits (number of visits)
14
0
0
7
0
10
1
1
3
1
4
1
7
1
Construction period (in months)
14
0
0
3
0
2
1
3
2
2
3
7
Environmental Practices (site inspection confirms appropriate...), assessment
14
0
0
1
0
No
7
1
Yes
7
3
Not applicable
0
Land Acquisition (site inspection confirms appropriate...), assessment
14
0
0
0
0
No
14
1
Yes
0
3
Not applicable
0
Social Safegaurds (site inspection confirms appropriate...), assessment
14
0
0
1
0
No
10
1
Yes
4
3
Not applicable
0
Transmission pipe (length), in m
14
0
.
4
1600
1
164
1
180
1
24
1
240
1
250
1
460
1
500
1
800
1
90
1
Transmission pipe (diameter), in cm
14
0
.
4
5
1
5.08
2
6
1
7.5
3
7.62
3
Transmission pipe (contains plastic)
14
0
.
4
0
5
1
5
Transmission pipe (contains steel)
14
0
.
4
0
5
1
5
Distribution pipe (length), in m
14
0
.
5
0
2
210
1
250
1
3200
1
420
1
426
1
480
1
6.7
1
Distribution pipe (diameter), in cm
14
0
.
5
.95
1
0
2
2
1
2.54
2
3.81
1
5.08
1
7.62
1
Distribution pipe (contains plastic)
14
0
.
7
0
1
1
6
Distribution pipe (contains steel)
14
0
.
7
0
6
1
1
Pipe Supply and Installation Costs (budget), in IDR
14
0
.
2
115955000
1
150417000
1
15200000
1
16143250
1
225681000
1
23798390
1
42517900
1
44770000
1
48175336
1
51777000
1
58395000
1
83463.39999999999
1
Pipe Supply and Installation Costs (actual), in IDR
14
0
.
2
1125586
1
1771579.1667
1
179369
1
192701.344
1
193258.3333333333
1
233580
1
3551998.507
1
46.629
1
55962.5
1
626737.5
1
70525.3125
1
72380.95238095238
1
Plastic Pipe Cost (standard unit, from Kabupaten records), in IDR / meter
14
0
.
8
164000
1
201748
1
38333.33333333334
1
48750
1
71863.82799999999
1
788400
1
Steel Pipe Cost (standard unit, from Kabupaten records), in IDR / meter
14
0
.
11
134922.5
1
1734756.2083
1
211985.124
1
Major repairs or rehabilitation performed
14
0
0
1
0
13
1
1
Major repairs or rehabilitation required
14
0
0
1
0
12
1
2
Cause of Damage, environmental
14
0
.
3
0
11
Cause of Damage, poor design
14
0
.
3
0
11
Cause of Damage, poor construction
14
0
.
3
0
11
Cause of Damage, materials
14
0
.
3
0
11
Cause of Damage, poor operations & maintanence
14
0
.
3
0
11
Repair Costs (actual)
14
0
.
2
300000
1
N/A
11
Repair Costs (estimated)
14
0
.
2
0
1
N/A
11
Repair performed by
14
0
.
2
N/A
11
Village labour
1
Repair date
14
0
.
2
43040
1
N/A
11
Routine Maintenance (resevoir cleaning)
14
0
0
0
0
14
Routine Maintenance (pipe repair)
14
0
0
1
0
13
1
1
Routine Maintenance (valve exercising)
14
0
0
0
0
14
Routine Maintenance (mechanical repair)
14
0
0
0
0
14
Routine Maintenance (filter bed replacement)
14
0
0
0
0
14
Routine Maintenance (painting)
14
0
0
0
0
14
Routine Maintenance (drainage)
14
0
0
0
0
14
Routine Maintenance (parts are easily available)
14
0
0
1
0
13
1
1
Operation and Maintanence Plan (has a multi-year plan)
14
0
.
13
0
1
Operation and Maintanence Plan (linked to line ministries)
14
0
.
13
0
1
Operation and Maintanence Plan (has clear division of responsibilities and costs
14
0
.
13
1
1
Operation and Maintanence Plan (contains estimated costs, routine)
14
0
.
13
1
1
Operation and Maintanence Plan (contains estimated costs, capital repairs)
14
0
.
13
0
1
Operation and Maintanence Committee (in place and functioning)
14
0
.
11
1
3
Operation and Maintanence Committee (user fee in place)
14
0
.
11
0
3
Operation and Maintanence Committee (user fee for specified services)
14
0
.
11
0
3
Operation and Maintanence Committee (contributions from other sources)
14
0
.
11
0
1
1
2
Operation and Maintanence Committee (current funds within operation and maintane
14
0
.
13
3000
1
Operation and Maintanence Committee (affordibility of user fees)
14
0
.
13
100
1
Operation and Maintanence Committee (government inputs to schools and medical cl
14
0
.
13
0
1
Operation and Maintanence Committee (labor and material input from community)
14
0
.
13
100
1
Operation and Maintanence Committee (labor and material input from government)
14
0
.
13
0
1
Operation and Maintanence Training (O&M training received)
14
0
.
14
Operation and Maintanence Training (ongoing capacity development)
14
0
.
14
Operation and Maintanence Training (annual training budget)
14
0
.
14
Climate Resiliency (safe from flooding)
14
0
.
1
0
1
1
12
Climate Resiliency (erosion protection measures are sufficient)
14
0
.
1
0
7
1
6
Climate Resiliency (low landslide risk; no steep slopes)
14
0
.
1
1
13
Climate Resiliency (low forest fire risk; clear area between building and forest
14
0
.
1
0
4
1
9
Issue Design (lack of construction details/elevations on dwg)
14
0
0
1
0
3
1
11
Issue Design (inaccurate drawings of pipe network)
14
0
0
1
0
4
1
10
Issue Design (improper steel reinforcement design)
14
0
0
1
0
9
1
5
Issue Design (constructed dimensions differ from plan)
14
0
0
1
0
8
1
6
Issue Layout (poor site selection for infrastructure)
14
0
0
1
0
12
1
2
Issue Layout (erosion protection around catchment facilities)
14
0
0
1
0
13
1
1
Issue Layout (fence around catchment facilities)
14
0
0
1
0
11
1
3
Issue Layout (watershed protection)
14
0
0
1
0
10
1
4
Issue Steel Reinforcement (short development length in steel reinforcing)
14
0
0
0
0
14
Issue Steel Reinforcement (improperly bent reinforcing cage stirrup bars)
14
0
0
0
0
14
Issue Steel Reinforcement (lack of tie bar wiring)
14
0
0
0
0
14
Issue Concrete (absence of concrete mix design)
14
0
0
1
0
12
1
2
Issue Concrete (honeycombing in concrete)
14
0
0
1
0
12
1
2
Issue Concrete (exposed/shallow reinforcing steel)
14
0
0
1
0
12
1
2
Issue Concrete (improper materials or poorly mixed concrete)
14
0
0
1
0
12
1
2
Issue Resevoir (no cleanout/overflow)
14
0
0
1
0
13
1
1
Issue Resevoir (improper lid/no lock)
14
0
0
1
0
13
1
1
Issue Resevoir (valve box issues)
14
0
0
1
0
12
1
2
14
0
0
1
0
13
1
1
Issue Pipe Network (pipes are not buried)
14
0
0
1
0
7
1
7
Issue Pipe Network (poor pipe connections)
14
0
0
1
0
6
1
8
Issue Pipe Network (lack of/inappropriate pipe support)
14
0
0
1
0
7
1
7
Issue Miscellaneous (mechanical fixtures broken/leaking)
14
0
0
1
0
12
1
2
Issue Miscellaneous (tapstand floor not sloped)
14
0
0
1
0
12
1
2
Issue Miscellaneous (poor drainage around public areas)
14
0
0
1
0
11
1
3
Issue Miscellaneous (concrete floor poorly constructed)
14
0
0
1
0
13
1
1
Issue Miscellaneous (roof needed over water source)
14
0
0
1
0
12
1
2
Did the process of infrastructure prioritization within the village follow Villa
14
0
1
4
1
Fully met requirements
5
2
Somewhat met requirements
2
3
Did not meet requirements
6
4
No Data
1
Did the procurement process (either swakelola or contractor) follow all laws and
14
0
1
4
1
Fully complied with laws
3
2
Somewhat complied with laws
4
3
Did not comply with laws
6
4
No Data
1
How many persons have been participating in these meetings and how effective are
14
0
2
5
1
Highly Effective (lots of participation)
0
2
Effective (some participation)
1
3
Moderately Effective (limited participation)
2
4
Ineffective (little participation)
10
5
No Data
1
Women's participation in prioritization, procurement and community meetings
14
0
2
5
1
Highly Effective (lots of participation, >50%)
0
2
Effective (some participation, about 50%)
1
3
Moderately Effective (limited participation, <25%)
4
4
Ineffective (little participation, <10%)
8
5
No Data
1
BPS unique village code
94
0
1103060002
2
1103060003
5
1103080003
2
1103080016
4
1118010002
1
1118040004
4
1118040015
2
3203150003
1
3203180008
2
3203180012
2
5302013003
5
5302013005
4
5302052016
4
5302052019
4
5312010019
4
5312010020
4
5312080008
4
5312080010
2
5312080017
2
6110020008
6
6110020012
1
6110070010
1
6110070014
5
7602051003
3
7602051005
3
7602061001
1
7602061004
4
8109020008
1
8109020017
1
8109020018
4
8109020029
1
8109030006
2
8109030009
1
8109030016
1
8109030017
1
Type of infrastructure
94
0
D
94
Village level identifying infrastructure number
94
0
D
11
D1
24
D2
24
D3
16
D4
14
D5
4
D6
1
Unique infrastructure number
94
0
1103060002D1
1
1103060002D2
1
1103060003D1
1
1103060003D2
1
1103060003D3
1
1103060003D4
1
1103060003D5
1
1103080003D1
1
1103080003D2
1
1103080016D1
1
1103080016D2
1
1103080016D3
1
1103080016D4
1
1118010002D
1
1118040004D1
1
1118040004D2
1
1118040004D3
1
1118040004D4
1
1118040015D1
1
1118040015D2
1
3203150003D
1
3203180008D1
1
3203180008D2
1
3203180012D1
1
3203180012D2
1
5302013003D1
1
5302013003D2
1
5302013003D3
1
5302013003D4
1
5302013003D5
1
5302013005D1
1
5302013005D2
1
5302013005D3
1
5302013005D4
1
5302052016D1
1
5302052016D2
1
5302052016D3
1
5302052016D4
1
5302052019D1
1
5302052019D2
1
5302052019D3
1
5302052019D4
1
5312010019D1
1
5312010019D2
1
5312010019D3
1
5312010019D4
1
5312010020D1
1
5312010020D2
1
5312010020D3
1
5312010020D4
1
5312080008D1
1
5312080008D2
1
5312080008D3
1
5312080008D4
1
5312080010D1
1
5312080010D2
1
5312080017D1
1
5312080017D2
1
6110020008D1
1
6110020008D2
1
6110020008D3
1
6110020008D4
1
6110020008D5
1
6110020008D6
1
6110020012D
1
6110070010D
1
6110070014D1
1
6110070014D2
1
6110070014D3
1
6110070014D4
1
6110070014D5
1
7602051003D1
1
7602051003D2
1
7602051003D3
1
7602051005D1
1
7602051005D2
1
7602051005D3
1
7602061001D
1
7602061004D1
1
7602061004D2
1
7602061004D3
1
7602061004D4
1
8109020008D
1
8109020017D
1
8109020018D1
1
8109020018D2
1
8109020018D3
1
8109020018D4
1
8109020029D
1
8109030006D1
1
8109030006D2
1
8109030009D
1
8109030016D
1
8109030017D
1
Year of infrastructure construction
94
0
2015
2017
2015
30
2016
33
2017
31
Type of infrastructure construction
94
0
1
2
1
New Construction
92
2
Rehabilitation
2
Modality of infrastructure construction
94
0
1
3
1
Swakelola
82
2
Contractor
1
3
Joint
11
Number of households benefitting from infrastructure construction
93
1
0
1361
Number of beneficiaries benefitting from infrastructure construction
94
0
0
5766
Remote/not remote status of infrastructure construction location, by village
94
0
1
2
1
Remote
38
2
Not Remote
56
Date of infrastructure construction inspection
93
2018-05-06
2018-11-08
2018-05-06
1
2018-05-07
2
2018-06-04
1
2018-06-05
2
2018-06-06
1
2018-06-07
4
2018-07-03
3
2018-07-04
7
2018-07-05
7
2018-07-06
4
2018-07-07
1
2018-07-09
7
2018-07-10
3
2018-07-11
3
2018-07-12
4
2018-07-13
1
2018-08-07
5
2018-08-08
8
2018-08-09
3
2018-08-10
11
2018-08-11
1
2018-08-13
3
2018-09-08
3
2018-10-07
4
2018-11-07
2
2018-11-08
2
Cross Section (crown/camber), % of road segment 0-100 m
94
0
0
100
94
0
0
100
Missing drainage structures, # from road segment 0-100 m
94
0
0
3
0
52
1
5
2
15
3
22
Improper construction materials, % of road segment 0-100 m
94
0
0
100
Slippery when wet, % of road segment 0-100 m
94
0
0
100
Very muddy during rainy season, % of road segment 0-100 m
94
0
0
100
Unstable slope above (too steep), % of road segment 0-100 m
94
0
0
80
Unstable slope below (too steep), % of road segment 0-100 m
94
0
0
80
Narrow width, % of road segment 0-100 m
94
0
0
100
Surface below standard, % of road segment 0-100 m
94
0
0
100
Low shoulder, % of road segment 0-100 m
94
0
0
100
Safety concerns, # from road segment 0-100 m
94
0
0
7
0
77
1
6
2
6
3
1
4
1
5
1
7
2
Cross Section (crown/camber), % of road segment 100-200 m
94
0
0
100
Inadequate roadside ditches, % of road segment 100-200 m
94
0
0
100
Missing drainage structures, # from of road segment 100-200 m
94
0
0
3
0
60
1
4
2
13
3
17
Improper construction materials, % of road segment 100-200 m
94
0
0
100
Slippery when wet, % of road segment 100-200 m
94
0
0
100
Very muddy during rainy season, % of road segment 100-200 m
94
0
0
100
Unstable slope above (too steep), % of road segment 100-200 m
94
0
0
70
Unstable slope below (too steep), % of road segment 100-200 m
94
0
0
60
Narrow width, % of road segment 100-200 m
94
0
0
100
Surface below standard, % of road segment 100-200 m
94
0
0
100
Low shoulder, % of road segment 100-200 m
94
0
0
100
Safety concerns, # from road segment 100-200 m
94
0
0
5
0
75
1
12
2
5
3
1
5
1
Cross Section (crown/camber), % of road segment 200-300 m
94
0
0
100
Inadequate roadside ditches, % of road segment 200-300 m
94
0
0
100
Missing drainage structures, # from road segment 200-300 m
94
0
0
3
0
67
1
3
2
10
3
14
Improper construction materials, % of road segment 200-300 m
94
0
0
70
Slippery when wet, % of road segment 200-300 m
94
0
0
100
Very muddy during rainy season, % of road segment 200-300 m
94
0
0
100
Unstable slope above (too steep), % of road segment 200-300 m
94
0
0
60
Unstable slope below (too steep), % of road segment 200-300 m
94
0
0
70
Narrow width, % of road segment 200-300 m
94
0
0
100
Surface below standard, % of road segment 200-300 m
94
0
0
100
Low shoulder, % of road segment 200-300 m
94
0
0
100
Safety concerns, # from road segment 200-300 m
94
0
0
6
0
77
1
11
2
2
3
1
4
2
6
1
Cross Section (crown/camber), % of road segment 300-400 m
94
0
0
100
Inadequate roadside ditches, % of road segment 300-400 m
94
0
0
100
Missing drainage structures, # from road segment 300-400 m
94
0
0
3
0
76
1
1
2
8
3
9
Improper construction materials, % of road segment 300-400 m
94
0
0
100
Slippery when wet, % of road segment 300-400 m
94
0
0
100
Very muddy during rainy season, % of road segment 300-400 m
94
0
0
100
Unstable slope above (too steep), % of road segment 300-400 m
94
0
0
80
Unstable slope below (too steep), % of road segment 300-400 m
94
0
0
50
Narrow width, % of road segment 300-400 m
94
0
0
20
0
90
10
2
20
2
Surface below standard, % of road segment 300-400 m
94
0
0
100
Low shoulder, % of road segment 300-400 m
94
0
0
100
Safety concerns, # from road segment 300-400 m
94
0
0
5
0
77
1
6
2
7
3
2
4
1
5
1
Cross Section (crown/camber), % of road segment 400-500 m
94
0
0
100
Inadequate roadside ditches, % of road segment 400-500 m
94
0
0
100
Missing drainage structure, # from road segment 400-500 m
94
0
0
3
0
79
1
1
2
8
3
6
Improper construction materials, % of road segment 400-500 m
94
0
0
100
Slippery when wet, % of road segment 400-500 m
94
0
0
100
Very muddy during rainy season, % of road segment 400-500 m
94
0
0
100
Unstable slope above (too steep), % of road segment 400-500 m
94
0
0
40
Unstable slope below (too steep), % of road segment 400-500 m
94
0
0
30
Narrow width, % of road segment 400-500 m
94
0
0
30
Surface below standard, % of road segment 400-500 m
94
0
0
100
Low shoulder, % of road segment 400-500 m
94
0
0
100
Safety concerns, # from road segment 400-500 m
94
0
0
4
0
84
1
6
2
2
3
1
4
1
Cross Section (crown/camber), % of road segment 500-600 m
94
0
0
100
Inadequate roadside ditches, % of road segment 500-600 m
94
0
0
100
Missing drainage structures, # from road segment 500-600 m
94
0
0
3
0
83
2
6
3
5
Improper construction materials, % of road segment 500-600 m
94
0
0
100
Slippery when wet, % of road segment 500-600 m
94
0
0
100
Very muddy during rainy season, % of road segment 500-600 m
94
0
0
100
Unstable slope above (too steep), % of road segment 500-600 m
94
0
0
60
Unstable slope below (too steep), % of road segment 500-600 m
94
0
0
40
Narrow width, % of road segment 500-600 m
94
0
0
20
0
91
10
2
20
1
Surface below standard, % of road segment 500-600 m
94
0
0
100
Low shoulder, % of road segment 500-600 m
94
0
0
100
Safety concerns, # from road segment 500-600 m
94
0
0
6
0
88
2
4
3
1
6
1
Cross Section (crown/camber), % of road segment 600-700 m
94
0
0
100
Inadequate roadside ditches, % of road segment 600-700 m
94
0
0
100
Missing drainage structures, # from road segment 600-700 m
94
0
0
3
0
84
2
5
3
5
Improper construction materials, % of road segment 600-700 m
94
0
0
100
Slippery when wet, % of road segment 600-700 m
94
0
0
100
Very muddy during rainy season, % of road segment 600-700 m
94
0
0
100
Unstable slope above (too steep), % of road segment 600-700 m
94
0
0
50
Unstable slope below (too steep), % of road segment 600-700 m
94
0
0
50
Narrow width, % of road segment 600-700 m
94
0
0
10
0
92
10
2
Surface below standard, % of road segment 600-700 m
94
0
0
100
Low shoulder, % of road segment 600-700 m
94
0
0
100
Safety concerns, # from road segment 600-700 m
94
0
0
3
0
88
1
2
2
3
3
1
Cross Section (crown/camber), % of road segment 700-800 m
94
0
0
100
Inadequate roadside ditches, % of road segment 700-800 m
94
0
0
100
Missing drainage structures, # from road segment 700-800 m
94
0
0
3
0
85
2
5
3
4
Improper construction materials, % of road segment 700-800 m
94
0
0
100
Slippery when wet, % of road segment 700-800 m
94
0
0
100
Very muddy during rainy season, % of road segment 700-800 m
94
0
0
100
Unstable slope above (too steep), % of road segment 700-800 m
94
0
0
20
0
90
10
2
20
2
Unstable slope below (too steep), % of road segment 700-800 m
94
0
0
10
0
92
10
2
Narrow width, % of road segment 700-800 m
94
0
0
10
0
93
10
1
Surface below standard, % of road segment 700-800 m
94
0
0
100
Low shoulder, % of road segment 700-800 m
94
0
0
100
Safety concerns, # from road segment 700-800 m
94
0
0
2
0
88
1
3
2
3
Cross Section (crown/camber), % of road segment 800-900 m
94
0
0
100
Inadequate roadside ditches, % of road segment 800-900 m
94
0
0
100
Missing drainage structures, # from road segment 800-900 m
94
0
0
3
0
85
2
5
3
4
Improper construction materials, % of road segment 800-900 m
94
0
0
100
Slippery when wet, % of road segment 800-900 m
94
0
0
100
Very muddy during rainy season, % of road segment 800-900 m
94
0
0
100
Unstable slope above (too steep), % of road segment 800-900 m
94
0
0
20
0
91
10
2
20
1
Unstable slope below (too steep), % of road segment 800-900 m
94
0
0
30
Narrow width, % of road segment 800-900 m
94
0
0
10
0
92
2
1
10
1
Surface below standard, % of road segment 800-900 m
94
0
0
100
Low shoulder, % of road segment 800-900 m
94
0
0
100
Safety concerns, # from road segment 800-900 m
94
0
0
4
0
87
1
3
2
2
4
2
Cross Section (crown/camber), % of road segment 900-1,000 m
94
0
0
100
Inadequate roadside ditches, % of road segment 900-1,000 m
94
0
0
100
Missing drainage structures, # from road segment 900-1,000 m
94
0
0
3
0
85
2
5
3
4
Improper construction materials, % of road segment 900-1,000 m
94
0
0
100
Slippery when wet, % of road segment 900-1,000 m
94
0
0
100
Very muddy during rainy season, % of road segment 900-1,000 m
94
0
0
100
Unstable slope above (too steep), % of road segment 900-1,000 m
94
0
0
30
Unstable slope below (too steep), % of road segment 900-1,000 m
94
0
0
10
0
92
10
2
Narrow width, % of road segment 900-1,000 m
94
0
0
0
0
94
Surface below standard, % of road segment 900-1,000 m
94
0
0
100
Low shoulder, % of road segment 900-1,000 m
94
0
0
100
Safety concerns, # from road segment 900-1,000 m
94
0
0
2
0
89
1
4
2
1
Retaining Wall (structural integrity), evaluation result
94
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
13
2
Slightly below specifications
9
3
Below specifications
3
4
Not inspected
0
5
Not applicable
69
Retaining Wall (weep holes), evaluation result
94
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
3
2
Slightly below specifications
0
3
Below specifications
13
4
Not inspected
0
5
Not applicable
78
Retaining Wall (erosion protection), evaluation result
94
0
0
5
0
1
1
Meets specifications
7
2
Slightly below specifications
4
3
Below specifications
2
4
Not inspected
1
5
Not applicable
79
Retaining Wall (construction techniques), evaluation result
94
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
6
2
Slightly below specifications
12
3
Below specifications
4
4
Not inspected
0
5
Not applicable
72
Retaining Wall (dimensions), evaluation result
94
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
18
2
Slightly below specifications
6
3
Below specifications
0
4
Not inspected
0
5
Not applicable
70
Culvert (layout), evaluation result
94
0
0
5
0
1
1
Meets specifications
9
2
Slightly below specifications
5
3
Below specifications
2
4
Not inspected
0
5
Not applicable
77
Culvert (construction techniques), evaluation result
94
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
5
2
Slightly below specifications
5
3
Below specifications
5
4
Not inspected
0
5
Not applicable
79
Small Bridge (layout), evaluation result
94
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
4
2
Slightly below specifications
1
3
Below specifications
1
4
Not inspected
0
5
Not applicable
88
Small Bridge (construction techniques), evaluation result
94
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
3
2
Slightly below specifications
1
3
Below specifications
1
4
Not inspected
0
5
Not applicable
89
Operation and maintenance, evaluation result
94
0
2
5
1
Meets specifications
0
2
Slightly below specifications
2
3
Below specifications
48
4
Not inspected
0
5
Not applicable
44
Construction quality, assessment
94
0
1
7
1
Highly satisfactory
1
2
Satisfactory
5
3
Moderately satisfactory
10
4
Highly unsatisfactory
7
5
Unsatisfactory
4
6
Highly unsatisfactory
1
7
No Data
66
Design completeness, assessment
94
0
2
4
1
Good
0
2
Average
7
3
Poor
21
4
No Data
66
Functionality, assessment
94
0
1
5
1
High
6
2
Average
17
3
Low
5
4
None
0
5
No Data
66
Adequacy of design consultation with users
94
0
1
3
0
No
0
1
Yes
15
2
13
3
No Data
66
File completeness (meeting notes, land donation records, design drawings, etc.
94
0
2
3
1
Yes
0
2
No
23
3
Not Available
71
Kabupaten engineer and TF inspection notes to file
94
0
2
3
1
Yes
0
2
No
24
3
Not Available
70
Final sub-project inspection report, in file and fully completed
94
0
2
3
1
Yes
0
2
No
23
3
Not Available
71
As-built drawing
94
0
2
3
1
Yes
0
2
No
23
3
Not Available
71
Quality of technical facilitation
94
0
1
4
1
Good
1
2
Average
0
3
Poor
25
4
No Data
68
Frequency of TF site visits (number of visits)
94
0
.
73
0
15
1
1
2
3
3
2
Construction period (in months)
94
0
.
73
0
1
12
1
2
4
3
14
6
1
Environmental Practices (site inspection confirms appropriate...), assessment
94
0
0
1
0
No
19
1
Yes
75
3
Not applicable
0
Land Acquisition (site inspection confirms appropriate...), assessment
94
0
0
1
0
No
93
1
Yes
1
3
Not applicable
0
Social Safegaurds (site inspection confirms appropriate...), assessment
94
0
0
1
0
No
59
1
Yes
35
3
Not applicable
0
Road (length), in m
94
0
.
28
100
3
1000
1
1025
1
1030
1
1050
1
110
1
117.3
1
1200
1
1220
1
130
1
135
1
150
3
153
2
1550
1
160
1
1600
2
1750
1
180
1
1800
1
194
1
195
1
200
1
2000
1
2050
1
208
1
21
1
212
1
225
1
241
1
250
2
251
1
256
1
270
1
290
1
30
1
300
1
311
1
314
1
326
1
400
2
450
2
466
1
483
1
485
1
500
1
528
1
600
1
650
1
700
1
750
1
90
1
95
2
962.5
1
975
2
98.5
1
Road (width), in m
94
0
.
28
.4
1
.425
1
1.65
1
12
1
2
5
2.2
1
2.4
1
2.42
1
2.5
6
2.93
1
3
25
3.1
1
3.12
1
3.2
1
3.45
1
3.5
2
3.56
1
3.75
1
3.8
1
3.9
1
4
5
5
6
9
1
Road Material (contains earth)
94
0
.
25
0
58
1
11
Road Material (contains gravel)
94
0
.
25
0
48
1
21
Road Material (contains concrete)
94
0
.
25
0
34
1
35
Road Material (contains asphalt)
94
0
.
25
0
67
1
2
Drainage Culvert (length), spot improvements in m
94
0
.
86
.2951388888888889
1
10.2
1
12
1
15
1
4
1
4.3
1
5
1
6
1
Drainage Culvert (width), spot improvements in m
94
0
.
86
.0055555555555556
1
.0430555555555556
1
.04375
1
.5
1
1
1
1.05
1
1.2
1
5
1
Drainage Culvert (diameter), spot improvements in m
94
0
.
86
.0041666666666667
1
.00625
1
.4
1
.5
1
.6
1
.7
1
0
1
2
1
Drainage Channel (length), spot improvements in m
94
0
.
77
112
1
128
1
158
1
160
1
175
1
190
1
200
1
225
1
250
1
273
1
3.5
1
450
1
49
1
510
1
540
1
650
1
703
1
Drainage Channel (width), spot improvements in m
94
0
.
77
.0041666666666667
1
.03125
2
.26
1
.27
1
.4
2
.425
1
.45
1
.5
3
.52
1
.6
1
.7
1
.9
1
1.25
1
Retaining Wall (length), spot improvements in m
94
0
.
74
100
1
105
1
122
1
138
1
200
1
220
1
228
1
270
1
29.5
1
350
1
360
1
37
1
463
1
476
1
500
1
60
1
7.333333333333333
1
81.5
1
90
1
975
1
Retaining Wall (height), spot improvements in m
94
0
.
77
.0034722222222222
1
.0055555555555556
1
.2
1
.38
1
.5
1
.7
2
.9
2
1.14
1
1.8
1
2.3
1
2.5
1
30
1
40
1
42
1
45
1
Road Installation Cost (budget), in IDR
94
0
.
32
100000000
1
103286000
1
111232200
1
111831000
1
120838000
1
124618000
1
13010000
1
131841600
1
131964000
1
132970000
1
13500000
1
138232500
1
140763800
1
152196000
1
166590000
1
170200000
1
17330625
1
175000000
1
179481000
1
181290155
1
199118000
1
213703000
1
219892500
3
227030000
1
235045000
1
253183000
1
263653000
1
277603159
1
27976500
2
293429250
1
298180129
1
304149550
1
31340000
1
34049000
1
34541086
1
35000000
2
381975000
1
399953100
1
406204000
1
499817600
1
50000000
1
527414000
1
54405000
1
60456181
1
60470000
1
63363000
1
68120000
1
69871000
1
75000000
2
75523500
1
76696731
1
79080000
1
80000000
1
80916000
1
81767000
1
92630000
1
98199000
1
Road Installation Cost (actual), in IDR / square meter
94
0
.
43
100865.234375
1
103938
1
10802.47
1
109970.00
1
110404.2048
1
113515
1
114705
1
123354.64
1
128241
1
128541
1
133333.3333333333
1
135108884
1
141916
1
148928.7333690987
1
158091.5032679739
1
159090.9090909091
1
159631
1
169388
1
170684
1
1732447.1717
1
174773
1
175000
1
175733.3333333333
1
186129.918227216
1
187896.2962962963
1
189636.1904761905
1
211284.6153846154
1
21275
1
225530.7692307692
2
229344.74
1
231075
1
251487.1795
1
26712.875
1
269583.8445807771
1
288013
1
29217
1
303083.3333333333
1
337577.3333
1
35934.39948
1
384615.3846153846
1
41526.02
1
45000
1
46423.31428571428
1
55007
1
604300.5166666667
1
61484
1
85726.70807453417
1
90937
1
92923.44929999999
1
93750
1
Road Installation Cost (standard unit, from Kabupaten records), in IDR / square
94
0
.
59
10802.47
1
115592.0892
1
133980.00
1
139917.53
1
147566.6341201717
1
155400
1
165000
4
167987.4707
1
169037.1799757492
1
169515
1
173082.0911111111
1
180426.619047619
1
193599.0913461538
1
203973.42
1
215200.41
1
218741.67
1
22179.83
1
248455.7012
1
26712.88
3
292671.05
1
324897
1
354710.3333
1
391739.63
1
43800
1
76696731
1
82586.64251207729
1
86751.95703125
1
94974
1
98000
1
99000
1
Drainage Installation Cost (budget), in IDR
94
0
.
69
100000000
1
104040000
1
126389600
1
15572200
1
160000000
1
16276000
1
165245000
1
195000000
1
199828000
1
26960000
1
29072000
1
328878875
1
34748000
1
36240000
1
36733500
1
42754000
1
49150000
1
51439000
1
64619500
2
75635700
1
7727697
1
90000000
1
92630000
1
95255500
1
Drainage Installation Cost (actual), in IDR / meter
94
0
.
69
116362
1
226500
1
245750
1
274725.2747252747
1
277382.6458036985
1
280865.7777
1
2850196.078431373
1
3288523
1
335177
1
3893050
1
391819.60784
1
401867.1875
1
462400
1
500000
1
501344.7368421053
1
5344250
1
586265
1
609034.9537037037
1
660980
1
709142.8571428572
1
853200
1
8615933
1
8615933.33
1
892857.1428571428
1
914285.7142857143
1
Drainage Installation Cost (standard unit, from Kabupaten records), in IDR / met
93
0
.
76
1008035.714285714
1
222706
1
227055
1
259157.51
1
269274.5889046942
1
270225.666
1
2808606
1
344217.1372
1
4229250
1
480555.5555555556
1
489000
1
539352.63
1
686547
1
727982
1
8635600
1
8635600.00
1
972571.4285714285
1
Wall Installation Cost (budget), in IDR
94
0
.
76
146100000
1
147204100
1
205720000
1
242263000
1
26.079.000
1
28655000
3
342,248,400.00
1
40410000
1
41545500
1
55233000
1
57818000
1
60.414.000
1
65.143.000
1
65516400
1
84077500
1
90272000
1
Wall Installation Cost (actual), in IDR / meter
94
0
.
78
1,944,593.18
1
118701
1
119293.7365
1
1562648.6486
1
2208237
1
2524171.7791
1
272904
1
29389.74358974359
2
339147
1
420387.5
1
508955.8823529412
1
53.966.643
1
640789.4736842106
1
727960
1
739934.42623
1
Wall Installation Cost (standard unit, from Kabupaten records), in IDR / meter
94
0
.
81
100300
1
117493.4017
1
144353.7908496732
1
1590850.4595
1
2282378.6748
1
237000
1
28043
1
28043.59
1
323310.7287340743
1
479255
1
534000
1
673464.9342105263
1
698820.4016
1
Major repairs or rehabilitation performed
94
0
0
1
0
82
1
12
Major repairs or rehabilitation required
94
0
0
1
0
88
1
6
Cause of Damage, environmental
94
0
.
12
0
82
Cause of Damage, poor design
94
0
.
12
0
82
Cause of Damage, poor construction
94
0
.
12
0
82
Cause of Damage, materials
94
0
.
12
0
78
1
4
Cause of Damage, poor operations & maintanence
94
0
.
12
0
82
Repair Costs (actual)
87
0
.
5
N/A
82
Repair Costs (estimated)
87
0
.
5
N/A
82
Repair performed by
94
0
.
12
N/A
82
Repair date
94
0
.
12
N/A
82
Routine Maintenance (pot hole / surface repair)
94
0
0
1
0
88
1
6
Routine Maintenance (erosion control of shoulders)
94
0
0
0
0
94
Routine Maintenance (erosion control of slopes)
94
0
0
0
0
94
Routine Maintenance (drainage)
94
0
0
1
0
93
1
1
Routine Maintenance (signs)
94
0
0
1
0
92
1
2
Routine Maintenance (minor repair to culverts / walls)
94
0
0
0
0
94
Routine Maintenance (regrading and re-gravelling)
94
0
0
0
0
94
Routine Maintenance (repair scour checks)
94
0
0
0
0
94
Maintain_9
94
0
0
0
0
94
Operation and Maintanence Plan (has a multi-year plan)
94
0
.
94
Operation and Maintanence Plan (linked to line ministries)
94
0
.
94
Operation and Maintanence Plan (has clear division of responsibilities and costs
94
0
.
94
Operation and Maintanence Plan (contains estimated costs, routine)
94
0
.
94
Operation and Maintanence Plan (contains estimated costs, capital repairs)
94
0
.
94
Operation and Maintanence Committee (in place and functioning)
94
0
.
94
Operation and Maintanence Committee (user fee in place)
94
0
.
94
Operation and Maintanence Committee (user fee for specified services)
94
0
.
94
Operation and Maintanence Committee (contributions from other sources)
94
0
.
94
Operation and Maintanence Committee (current funds within operation and maintane
94
0
.
94
Operation and Maintanence Committee (affordibility of user fees)
94
0
.
94
Operation and Maintanence Committee (government inputs to schools and medical cl
94
0
.
94
Operation and Maintanence Committee (labor and material input from community)
94
0
.
94
Operation and Maintanence Committee (labor and material input from government)
94
0
.
94
Operation and Maintanence Training (O&M training received)
94
0
.
94
Operation and Maintanence Training (ongoing capacity development)
94
0
.
94
Operation and Maintanence Training (annual training budget)
94
0
.
94
Climate Resiliency (safe from flooding)
94
0
.
20
0
12
1
62
Climate Resiliency (erosion protection measures are sufficient)
94
0
.
20
0
29
1
45
Climate Resiliency (low landslide risk; no steep slopes)
94
0
.
20
0
6
1
68
Climate Resiliency (low forest fire risk; clear area between building and forest
94
0
.
20
0
11
1
63
Issue Design (lack of construction details on drawings)
94
0
0
1
0
44
1
50
Issue Design (lack of accurate measurements on drwg)
94
0
0
1
0
53
1
41
Issue Design (improper cross section)
94
0
0
1
0
59
1
35
Issue Design (drainage considerations)
94
0
0
1
0
43
1
51
Issue Construction (improper materials)
94
0
0
1
0
51
1
43
Issue Construction (lack of compaction)
94
0
0
1
0
71
1
23
Issue Pipe, Culver and Channel (dimensions/layout)
94
0
0
1
0
84
1
10
Issue Pipe, Culver and Channel (improperly buried)
94
0
0
1
0
90
1
4
Issue Pipe, Culver and Channel (erosion protection)
94
0
0
1
0
89
1
5
Issue Steel Reinforcement (short development length in steel reinforcing)
94
0
0
0
0
94
Issue Steel Reinforcement (improperly bent reinforcing cage stirrup bars)
94
0
0
0
0
94
Issue Steel Reinforcement (lack of tie bar wiring)
94
0
0
0
0
94
Issue Concrete (absence of concrete mix design)
94
0
0
1
0
58
1
36
Issue Concrete (honeycombing in concrete)
94
0
0
1
0
75
1
19
Issue Concrete (exposed/shallow reinforcing steel)
94
0
0
1
0
92
1
2
Issue Concrete (improper materials or poorly mixed concrete)
94
0
0
1
0
64
1
30
Issue Wall (foundation/structural integrity)
94
0
0
1
0
91
1
3
Issue Wall (batter)
94
0
0
1
0
93
1
1
Issue Wall (wep holes)
94
0
0
1
0
79
1
15
Issue Wall (poor drainage at foot of wall)
94
0
0
1
0
89
1
5
Issue Wall (finishing)
94
0
0
1
0
93
1
1
Issue Slopes (fill slope - 1 vert.:4 horiz. max)
94
0
0
1
0
91
1
3
Issue Slopes (cut slope - 1 vert.:2 horiz. max)
94
0
0
1
0
91
1
3
Did the process of infrastructure prioritization within the village follow Villa
94
0
1
4
1
Fully met requirements
20
2
Somewhat met requirements
59
3
Did not meet requirements
13
4
No Data
2
Did the procurement process (either swakelola or contractor) follow all laws and
94
0
1
4
1
Fully complied with laws
22
2
Somewhat complied with laws
55
3
Did not comply with laws
15
4
No Data
2
How many persons have been participating in these meetings and how effective are
94
0
2
5
1
Highly Effective (lots of participation)
0
2
Effective (some participation)
28
3
Moderately Effective (limited participation)
37
4
Ineffective (little participation)
27
5
No Data
2
Women's participation in prioritization, procurement and community meetings
94
0
1
5
1
Highly Effective (lots of participation, >50%)
1
2
Effective (some participation, about 50%)
18
3
Moderately Effective (limited participation, <25%)
47
4
Ineffective (little participation, <10%)
26
5
No Data
2
BPS unique village code
12
0
1118010002
2
1118010006
3
1118040004
2
1118040015
1
3203180008
1
5302052016
1
6110070010
1
7602061001
1
Type of infrastructure
12
0
E
12
Village level identifying infrastructure number
12
0
E
5
E1
3
E2
3
E3
1
Unique infrastructure number
12
0
1118010002E1
1
1118010002E2
1
1118010006E1
1
1118010006E2
1
1118010006E3
1
1118040004E1
1
1118040004E2
1
1118040015E
1
3203180008E
1
5302052016E
1
6110070010E
1
7602061001E
1
Year of infrastructure construction
12
0
2015
2017
2015
3
2016
5
2017
4
Type of infrastructure construction
12
0
1
2
1
New Construction
10
2
Rehabilitation
2
Modality of infrastructure construction
12
0
1
1
1
Swakelola
12
2
Contractor
0
3
Joint
0
Number of households benefitting from infrastructure construction
12
0
15
80
Number of beneficiaries benefitting from infrastructure construction
12
0
0
304
Remote/not remote status of infrastructure construction location, by village
12
0
1
2
1
Remote
11
2
Not Remote
1
Date of infrastructure construction inspection
12
2018-05-06
2018-12-07
2018-05-06
1
2018-07-09
1
2018-07-13
2
2018-08-08
1
2018-08-11
1
2018-10-07
2
2018-11-07
1
2018-12-07
3
System layout, evaluation result
12
0
1
3
1
Meets specifications
7
2
Slightly below specifications
4
3
Below specifications
1
4
Not inspected
0
5
Not applicable
0
Resevoir design, evaluation result
12
0
2
5
1
Meets specifications
0
2
Slightly below specifications
3
3
Below specifications
0
4
Not inspected
4
5
Not applicable
5
Weir, evaluation result
12
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
2
2
Slightly below specifications
0
3
Below specifications
0
4
Not inspected
5
5
Not applicable
5
Water level controls, evaluation result
12
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
6
2
Slightly below specifications
1
3
Below specifications
0
4
Not inspected
2
5
Not applicable
3
Ditches, evaluation result
12
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
2
2
Slightly below specifications
5
3
Below specifications
0
4
Not inspected
1
5
Not applicable
4
Culvert and pipes, evaluation result
12
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
1
2
Slightly below specifications
0
3
Below specifications
0
4
Not inspected
2
5
Not applicable
9
Embankments (fill slope), evaluation result
12
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
5
2
Slightly below specifications
3
3
Below specifications
0
4
Not inspected
0
5
Not applicable
4
Embankments (cut slope), evaluation result
12
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
6
2
Slightly below specifications
2
3
Below specifications
0
4
Not inspected
3
5
Not applicable
1
Channel (dimensions), evaluation result
12
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
5
2
Slightly below specifications
2
3
Below specifications
0
4
Not inspected
4
5
Not applicable
1
Channel (field outlets), evaluation result
12
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
3
2
Slightly below specifications
4
3
Below specifications
3
4
Not inspected
0
5
Not applicable
2
Channel control structures, evaluation result
12
0
3
5
1
Meets specifications
0
2
Slightly below specifications
0
3
Below specifications
2
4
Not inspected
5
5
Not applicable
5
Retaining Wall (structural integrity), evaluation result
12
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
2
2
Slightly below specifications
0
3
Below specifications
0
4
Not inspected
0
5
Not applicable
10
Retaining Wall (erosion protection), evaluation result
12
0
1
5
1
Meets specifications
1
2
Slightly below specifications
0
3
Below specifications
0
4
Not inspected
2
5
Not applicable
9
Operation and maintenance, evaluation result
12
0
3
5
1
Meets specifications
0
2
Slightly below specifications
0
3
Below specifications
2
4
Not inspected
3
5
Not applicable
7
Construction quality, assessment
12
0
4
6
1
Highly satisfactory
0
2
Satisfactory
0
3
Moderately satisfactory
0
4
Highly unsatisfactory
1
5
Unsatisfactory
6
6
Highly unsatisfactory
5
Design completeness, assessment
12
0
1
2
1
Good
7
2
Average
5
3
Poor
0
Functionality, assessment
12
0
2
2
1
High
0
2
Average
12
3
Low
0
4
None
0
Adequacy of design consultation with users
12
0
2
3
1
Yes
0
2
No
3
3
No Data
9
File completeness (meeting notes, land donation records, design drawings, etc.
12
0
1
4
1
Yes
9
2
No
0
3
Not Available
1
4
No Data
2
Kabupaten engineer and TF inspection notes to file
12
0
1
4
1
Yes
9
2
No
0
3
Not Available
0
4
No Data
3
Final sub-project inspection report, in file and fully completed
12
0
1
4
1
Yes
10
2
No
0
3
Not Available
0
4
No Data
2
As-built drawing
12
0
1
2
1
Yes
10
2
No
2
3
Not Available
0
4
No Data
0
Quality of technical facilitation
12
0
1
2
1
Good
4
2
Average
8
3
Poor
0
Frequency of TF site visits (number of visits)
12
0
.
3
1
2
15
1
2
2
3
4
Construction period (in months)
12
0
.
3
1
1
2
3
3
5
Environmental Practices (site inspection confirms appropriate...), assessment
12
0
0
1
0
No
1
1
Yes
11
3
Not applicable
0
Land Acquisition (site inspection confirms appropriate...), assessment
12
0
0
0
0
No
12
1
Yes
0
3
Not applicable
0
Social Safegaurds (site inspection confirms appropriate...), assessment
12
0
0
1
0
No
10
1
Yes
2
3
Not applicable
0
Canal (length), in m
12
0
30
1300
Canal (width), in m
12
0
0.075
90
Canal (depth), in m
12
0
0.075
40
Canal Material (contains earth)
12
0
0
0
0
12
Canal Material (contains masonry)
12
0
0
1
0
9
1
3
Canal Material (contains concrete)
12
0
0
1
0
4
1
8
Canal Cost (budget), in IDR
12
0
92872
300000000
Canal Cost (actual), in IDR / meter
12
0
.
1
244125.57078
1
247279.92087
1
249947
1
258697
1
333333.3333333333
1
349184
1
367343
1
446123
1
447300
1
764660.47888
1
775405.26316
1
Canal Cost (standard unit, from Kabupaten records), in IDR / meter
12
0
.
3
235000
1
239956.1672
1
263711.977760127
1
309407
1
310000
1
357927.6796116505
1
463499.6133333333
1
746503.9
1
753092.5452000001
1
Major repairs or rehabilitation performed
12
0
0
0
0
12
Major repairs or rehabilitation required
12
0
0
0
0
12
Cause of Damage, environmental
12
0
0
0
0
12
Cause of Damage, poor design
12
0
0
0
0
12
Cause of Damage, poor construction
12
0
0
0
0
12
Cause of Damage, materials
12
0
0
0
0
12
Cause of Damage, poor operations & maintanence
12
0
0
0
0
12
Repair Costs (actual)
12
0
N/A
12
Repair Costs (estimated)
12
0
N/A
12
Repair performed by
12
0
N/A
12
Repair date
12
0
N/A
12
Routine Maintenance (vegetation removal, aquatic and terrestrial)
12
0
0
1
0
7
1
5
Routine Maintenance (sediment removal)
12
0
0
1
0
6
1
6
Routine Maintenance (mechanical gates, outlets)
12
0
0
0
0
12
Routine Maintenance (canal repair)
12
0
0
0
0
12
Routine Maintenance (embankment erosion protection)
12
0
0
0
0
12
Routine Maintenance (fencing repair)
12
0
0
0
0
12
Operation and Maintanence Plan (has a multi-year plan)
12
0
.
12
Operation and Maintanence Plan (linked to line ministries)
12
0
.
12
Operation and Maintanence Plan (has clear division of responsibilities and costs
12
0
.
12
Operation and Maintanence Plan (contains estimated costs, routine)
12
0
.
12
Operation and Maintanence Plan (contains estimated costs, capital repairs)
12
0
.
12
Operation and Maintanence Committee (in place and functioning)
12
0
.
10
1
2
Operation and Maintanence Committee (user fee in place)
12
0
.
10
1
2
Operation and Maintanence Committee (user fee for specified services)
12
0
.
10
0
2
Operation and Maintanence Committee (contributions from other sources)
12
0
.
10
1
2
Operation and Maintanence Committee (current funds within operation and maintane
12
0
.
10
6000000
2
Operation and Maintanence Committee (affordibility of user fees)
12
0
.
10
0
2
Operation and Maintanence Committee (government inputs to schools and medical cl
12
0
.
10
0
2
Operation and Maintanence Committee (labor and material input from community)
12
0
.
10
100
2
Operation and Maintanence Committee (labor and material input from government)
12
0
.
10
0
2
Operation and Maintanence Training (O&M training received)
12
0
.
10
0
2
Operation and Maintanence Training (ongoing capacity development)
12
0
.
10
0
2
Operation and Maintanence Training (annual training budget)
12
0
.
10
0
2
Climate Resiliency (safe from flooding)
12
0
0
1
0
1
1
11
Climate Resiliency (low landslide risk; no steep slopes)
12
0
1
1
1
12
Climate Resiliency (low forest fire risk; clear area between building and forest
12
0
0
1
0
2
1
10
Issue Design (lack of construction details on drawings)
12
0
0
1
0
3
1
9
Issue Design (inaccurate drawings of connection details)
12
0
0
1
0
9
1
3
Issue Design (improper steel reinforcement design)
12
0
0
1
0
11
1
1
Issue Design (constructed dimensions differ from plan)
12
0
0
1
0
11
1
1
Issue Layout (poor site selection for infrastructure)
12
0
0
1
0
11
1
1
Issue Layout (erosion protection around facilities)
12
0
0
1
0
11
1
1
Issue Layout (improper weir design)
12
0
0
1
0
11
1
1
Issue Layout (undermining from poor elevation of apron)
12
0
0
0
0
12
Issue Steel Reinforcement (short development length in steel reinforcing)
12
0
0
0
0
12
Issue Steel Reinforcement (improperly bent reinforcing cage stirrups)
12
0
0
0
0
12
Issue Steel Reinforcement (lack of tie bar wiring)
12
0
0
0
0
12
Issue Concrete (absence of concrete mix design)
12
0
0
1
0
4
1
8
Issue Concrete (honeycombing in concrete)
12
0
0
1
0
8
1
4
Issue Concrete (exposed/shallow reinforcing steel)
12
0
0
0
0
12
Issue Concrete (improper materials or poorly mixed concrete)
12
0
0
1
0
8
1
4
Issue Resevoir Emankment (steep slopes)
12
0
0
0
0
12
Issue Resevoir Emankment (no erosion protection)
12
0
0
1
0
11
1
1
Issue Resevoir Emankment (undermining)
12
0
0
0
0
12
Issue Irrigation Controls (highly vegetated)
12
0
0
1
0
10
1
2
Issue Irrigation Controls (no controls for field outlets)
12
0
0
1
0
4
1
8
Issue Irrigation Controls (broken concrete)
12
0
0
1
0
6
1
6
Issue Channel Controls (mechanical fixtures broken or leaking)
12
0
0
0
0
12
Issue Channel Controls (broken concrete)
12
0
0
0
0
12
Did the process of infrastructure prioritization within the village follow Villa
12
0
1
4
1
Fully met requirements
5
2
Somewhat met requirements
5
3
Did not meet requirements
0
4
No Data
2
Did the procurement process (either swakelola or contractor) follow all laws and
12
0
2
4
1
Fully complied with laws
0
2
Somewhat complied with laws
10
3
Did not comply with laws
0
4
No Data
2
How many persons have been participating in these meetings and how effective are
12
0
2
5
1
Highly Effective (lots of participation)
0
2
Effective (some participation)
1
3
Moderately Effective (limited participation)
1
4
Ineffective (little participation)
8
5
No Data
2
Women's participation in prioritization, procurement and community meetings
12
0
2
5
1
Highly Effective (lots of participation, >50%)
0
2
Effective (some participation, about 50%)
1
3
Moderately Effective (limited participation, <25%)
4
4
Ineffective (little participation, <10%)
5
5
No Data
2