Type | Journal Article - AIDS |
Title | The Economic Impact of Severe Illness and Prime Age Mortality: Evidence from Panel Data from KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa |
Author(s) | |
Volume | 21 |
Publication (Day/Month/Year) | 2007 |
Page numbers | S67-S73 |
URL | http://www.aae.wisc.edu/mrcarter/Papers/The Economic Impact of Episodes of Adult Morbidity andMortality_jal.pdf |
Abstract | At the end of 2003, 5.3 million people were estimated to be living with HIV/AIDS in South Africa, the highest number of any country in the world. Further, the HIV/AIDS prevalence rate among adults 15-49 years of age in South Africa is estimated at 21.5%, compared to 7.5% in sub-Saharan Africa and 1.1% globally. As the epidemic moves from infection into impact, prime-age mortality (PAM) rates are increasing rapidly. According to the South African Medical Research Council, an estimated 370,000 South Africans died of HIV/AIDS in 2003, make the disease the leading cause of death in almost all South African provinces (MRC, 2004). Moreover, while it is thought that HIV prevalence in South Africa may be approaching its plateau, the majority of AIDS deaths have yet to happen (MRC, 2004). The economic impact of these deaths includes the loss of earnings due to incapacitation and death, the financial cost of care and the opportunity cost associated with the time of care-givers, and the financial cost of burial arrangements. Other costs associated with infectious disease more generally include those arising from behaviour changes such as reduced propensity to save or invest, changes to demographic behaviour such as fertility and family composition, and changes in the allocation of resources within the household, such as education and care of children and the workload of the elderly. An increasing number of studies are focusing on the measurement of the overall impact of HIV/AIDS deaths at the level of the household (Yamano and Jayne, 2003; Naidu and Harris, 2005), and most conclude that this impact is likely to be significant. A limitation of the majority of these studies is the tendency to treat those affected as a homogenous group with similar trajectories prior to the shock that is induced by HIV/AIDS. As a result, the impact measured is for the ‘average’ household observed at a single moment in time. As UNECA (2003:5) have commented, economic models of the impact of HIV/AIDS have thus yet to capture the immiseration impact at the household level. |
» | South Africa - Project for Statistics on Living Standards and Development 1993 |