IHSN Survey Catalog
  • Home
  • Microdata Catalog
  • Citations
  • Login
    Login
    Home / Central Data Catalog / LSO_2008_AFB-R4_V01_M / variable [F2]
central

Afrobarometer Survey 2008, Round 4

Lesotho, 2008
Get Microdata
Reference ID
LSO_2008_AFB-R4_v01_M
Producer(s)
The Institute for Democracy in South Africa (IDASA), Ghana Centre for Democratic Development (CDD-Ghana), Michigan State University (MSU)
Metadata
DDI/XML JSON
Created on
Jan 16, 2021
Last modified
Jan 16, 2021
Page views
7229
Downloads
255
  • Study Description
  • Data Dictionary
  • Downloads
  • Get Microdata
  • Data files
  • les_r4_data.sav

Q98k.NEPAD/APRM useful initiate vs. empty one (Q98K)

Data file: les_r4_data.sav

Overview

Valid: 1200
Invalid: -
Minimum: -1
Maximum: 9
Mean: 5.44083333333333
Standard deviation: 3.34302445139494
Type: Discrete
Decimal: 0
Start: 926
End: 928
Width: 3
Range: -1 - 9
Format: Numeric

Questions and instructions

Literal question
98K. Which of the following statements is closest to your view? Choose Statement 1 or Statement 2.
Statement 1: The NEPAD African Peer Review Mechanism (NEPAD/APRM) is a useful initiative that will help promote good governance in Africa. It should be given all necessary support.
Statement 2: The NEPAD/APRM is an empty initiative that is unlikely to do anything to improve governance in Africa. We should not waste time or resources in supporting it.
Categories
Value Category Cases
-1 Missing 1
0.1%
1 Agree very strongly with 1 241
20.1%
2 Agree with 1 80
6.7%
3 Agree with 2 100
8.3%
4 Agree very strongly with 2 173
14.4%
5 Agree with neither 77
6.4%
9 Don't know 528
44%
998 Refused 0
0%
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Interviewer instructions
Probe for strength of opinion: Do you agree or agree very strongly?
Back to Catalog
IHSN Survey Catalog

© IHSN Survey Catalog, All Rights Reserved.