IHSN Survey Catalog
  • Home
  • Microdata Catalog
  • Citations
  • Login
    Login
    Home / Central Data Catalog / SLV_2009_MCC-NTH_V01_M
central

Northern Transnational Highway 2009-2014

El Salvador, 2009 - 2014
Reference ID
SLV_2009_MCC-NTH_v01_M
Producer(s)
Social Impact Inc.
Metadata
DDI/XML JSON
Created on
Jul 07, 2015
Last modified
Mar 29, 2019
Page views
2857
Downloads
471
  • Study Description
  • Downloads
  • Get Microdata
  • Related Publications
  • Identification
  • Version
  • Scope
  • Coverage
  • Producers and sponsors
  • Sampling
  • Survey instrument
  • Data collection
  • Data processing
  • Access policy
  • Contacts
  • Metadata production
  • Identification

    Survey ID number

    SLV_2009_MCC-NTH_v01_M

    Title

    Northern Transnational Highway 2009-2014

    Translated Title

    Carretera Longitudinal del Norte

    Country
    Name Country code
    El Salvador SLV
    Study type

    Independent Impact Evaluation

    Abstract

    The benefits of the connectivity project will be measured using a rigorous impact evaluation methodology. An impact evaluation is a study that measures changes in outcomes affecting wellbeing that can be attributed to a specific intervention. Impact evaluations require a credible and rigorously defined counterfactual that estimates what would have happened to the beneficiaries in the absence of the project. Estimated impacts, when contrasted with total related costs, provide an assessment of the intervention’s cost effectiveness.

    It is expected that this project will reduce transportation costs and enable households to extend their labor activities and diversify their income sources. The first questions are related to the project outputs (direct products of the program, such as segments of the NTH constructed, etc.) as opposed to outcomes or impacts (changes access to markets, changes in income).

    Some questions that will be addressed in the impact evaluation:

    • Was the NTH implemented according to plan?
    • Did the NTH reach the originally intended beneficiaries? Did it reach unintended population or sectors of the economy?
    • Does access to the improved NTH improve market participation by increasing the likelihood of going to the market and/or the volume sold in the market?
    • Does access to the improved NTH increase income from agricultural sources?
    • Does access to the improved NTH increase the availability of non-farm employment and promote the creation of non-farm enterprises?
    • Does access to the improved NTH increase the use of public services? Specifically, health and education services?

    Kind of Data

    Sample survey data [ssd]

    Unit of Analysis

    Households

    Version

    Version Description

    Raw data for internal use only

    Scope

    Topics
    Topic
    El Salvador
    Roads
    Impact evaluation
    Continous treatment
    Regression Discontinuity
    Keywords
    Roads Transport Impact evaluation Continous treatment Regression discontinuity

    Coverage

    Geographic Coverage

    The connectivity project initially consisted of a network of connecting roads (NCR) and the Northern Transnational Highway but because of the significant increase in construction costs and the existence of other interventions in connecting roads the project only focused on the Northern Transnational Highway. As a result of these changes the current impact evaluation design focuses only on the evaluation of the Northern Transnational Highway.

    Universe

    The population being analyzed consists of the people living within a 30 minute radius of the NTH. This region (the Northern Zone) contains one-half of El Salvador’s poorest municipalities and suffered more damage from the country’s internal conflict during the 1980s than any other region. Economic and social indicators in the Northern Zone are currently worse than the national averages.

    Producers and sponsors

    Primary investigators
    Name
    Social Impact Inc.
    Funding Agency/Sponsor
    Name
    Millennium Challenge Corporation

    Sampling

    Sampling Procedure

    The household survey for the connectivity impact evaluation interviewed 3,450 households at baseline. There was high attrition in the first two follow-up surveys (2010 and 2011), with few of the households lost in the follow-up being regained in 2011. In the 2012 round, the evaluator implemented a farther-reaching tracking of the baseline households and were able to recuperate more households, bringing the effective sample size in the 2012 survey to 3,065 households. For the endline survey in 2014, the evaluator will continue to track down the baseline households that are still missing and, to the extent possible, use methods that are robust to unbalanced panel data in the final analysis.

    Survey instrument

    Questionnaires

    Quantitative Household Survey: The baseline and endline survey questionnaire includes two sections – one (including questions about household income and agricultural productivity) that is answered by the male head of household who is interviewed by a male survey taker and one (including questions about household demographics, time allocation, and expenses) which is answered by a female in the household, i.e. spouse or female household head, who is interviewed by a female survey taker.

    Quantitative and Qualitative Community Survey: The community survey was administered to key informants in communities where selected households live; each section of the survey was administered to the better-informed informant.

    Data collection

    Dates of Data Collection
    Start End Cycle
    2009 2010 Baseline
    2010 2011 Follow-up 1
    2011 2012 Follow-up 2
    2012 2013 Follow-up 3
    2013 2014 Follow-up 4
    Data Collectors
    Name Affiliation
    Social Impact
    Dirección General de Estadísticas y Censos - El Salvador National Statistics El Salvador National Statistics
    Supervision

    Interviewing was conducted by teams of interviewers. Each interviewing team comprised of 3-4 interviewers, and a supervisor, and a driver.

    The role of the supervisor was to coordinate field data collection activities, including management of the field teams, supplies and equipment, finances, maps and listings, coordinate with local authorities concerning the survey plan and make arrangements for accommodation and travel. Additionally, a chief field supervisor assigned the work to the supervisors/interviewers, spot checked work, maintained field control documents, and sent completed questionnaires and progress reports to the central office.

    The team 2 coordinators for data entry and quality control that were responsible for managing the headquarter team reviewing each questionnaire, checking for missed questions, skip errors, fields incorrectly completed, and checking for inconsistencies in the data.
    For the follow-up surveys electronic devices where specifically programmed for the survey that automatically performed checks of the data in the field.

    Data Collection Notes

    The surveys took place from November to February of the indicated years.

    Data processing

    Data Editing

    The evaluator will produce cleaned raw datasets that follows MCC’s guidelines for public use data, including programming syntax used to clean the datasets for documentation purposes.

    A full set of documentation for each survey will be provided. The raw data and the data used for the final analysis will be provided. A public use version of analysis data files will be provided. The publicly available version will be anonymized, and thus free of personal or geographic identifiers that would permit identification of individual respondents or their household members.

    Access policy

    Location of Data Collection

    Millennium Challenge Corporation

    Archive where study is originally stored

    Millennium Challenge Corporation
    http://data.mcc.gov/evaluations/index.php/catalog/135
    Cost: None

    Contacts

    Contacts
    Name Affiliation Email
    Monitoring & Evaluation Division Millennium Challenge Corporation impact-eval@mcc.gov

    Metadata production

    DDI Document ID

    DDI_SLV_2009_MCC-NTH_v01_M

    Producers
    Name Role
    Millennium Challenge Corporation Metadata Production
    Date of Metadata Production

    2014-12-17

    Metadata version

    DDI Document version

    Version 1.0 (December 2014)
    Version 1.1 (January 2015) : Description of main outcomes, other.
    Version 2.0 (April 2015). Edited version based on Version 01 (ddi-mcc-slv-socialimpact-connectivity-2014-v1) that was done by Millennium Challenge Corporation.

    Version notes

    Salvadorans in the Northern Zone in areas near rehabilitated infrastructure

    Back to Catalog
    IHSN Survey Catalog

    © IHSN Survey Catalog, All Rights Reserved.