Management, Organization and Innovation Survey 2009
Germany, 2008 - 2009
Get MicrodataCreated on
Dec 19, 2011
Last modified
Mar 29, 2019
Page views
12234
Downloads
1013
- Data files
-
Germany-2009-MOI-full
data-
interviewer comments (a17x)
Data file: Germany-2009-MOI-full data-
Overview
Valid:
222
Type:
Discrete
Start:
1506
End:
1749
Width:
244
Format:
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category |
|---|---|
| a few numbers about 2 hierarchical levels were unknown | |
| after a few adjournments there is a very good, interesting appointment, finally. very nice person. | |
| company rose out of another and was founded in the actual form in 2002 | |
| difficult company direction and structure. many reschedules and machine problems | |
| extensive interview, partly with support of business documents | |
| few hierarchy in company. interviewed operations manager was set on same level with proxy/project manager | |
| in relaxed atmosphere, the interview had been accomplished without interruptions | |
| interview had one break, but interviewer considers that it had no influence on results | |
| interview was a bit unclear | |
| interview was rescheduled two times. interviewee volunteered to be interviewed at home then. | |
| interviewed house is the headquarter of the company which has branches in germany and other countries. the questionnaire does not consider that the headquarter could be direct object of investigation. | |
| interviewee asked for anonymity two times during the interview though interviewer declared privacy policy. interviewer guesses that the target person could be won over to participate in future studies by sending him the results of the actual st | |
| interviewee pervaded the interview with personal and company details that were not asked for | |
| it took a period of 8 days with a lot of calls and faxes until interview appointment was scheduled | |
| many reschedules | |
| mistakes in the questionnaire. i.e. there is the question: how many employees had the company 3 years ago, so in 2004. what is the right answer? there are questions that ask if the headquarter must be interviewed. what if the interviewed branc | |
| no abnormality | |
| no big problems | |
| no comments | |
| no noticeable problems, respondent very competent and polite | |
| no problem | |
| no problems | |
| no problems - the results of this interview are correct. the target person thinks the interview was comfortable | |
| no problems, numbers were told spontaneously | |
| no problems, target person wants to receive results of study | |
| no problems, target person wants to recieve results of study | |
| no special incidents | |
| no special incidents or problems | |
| no special incidents or problems. privacy was very important. interviewee wishes information about results of the study | |
| none | |
| not any | |
| nothing | |
| partly estimations because whole company is huge | |
| problems only with availability of target person | |
| problems with proprietor: cooperative was a juristic person with many associates | |
| production manager suprisingly became ill so the interview was performed with deputy (team leader) | |
| questionnaire contains rough mistakes | |
| questions didn't fit in the situation of limited company. it's no branch but a company that is part of holding which possesses other companies in germany and other countries. founder of company leads holding. | |
| questions partly too indefinite | |
| several questions could not be answered because target person worked in different part of the company before | |
| sometimes estimations | |
| target person answered some questions with support of business document. interview was merely possible after end of business day | |
| target person could not give answers about numbers of employees of total company, answers of the production manager are estimations | |
| target person had only few time | |
| target person is absolutly competent, no problems | |
| target person wanted to abort interview after a few minutes, because he saw no sense in the questions about executive direction and family and doubted the sense of the study | |
| target person was prepared for interview and used corporate documents that were saved on his laptop to answer questions | |
| the interviews ran without problems. before it was rescheduled 3 times | |
| the questions were partly stated as too intern | |
| the target person critisises the lenght of the interview and part of the questions |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.