Type | Working Paper |
Title | Who decides? Joint decision making leads to better obstetric choices |
Author(s) | |
Publication (Day/Month/Year) | |
URL | https://paa.confex.com/paa/2016/mediafile/ExtendedAbstract/Paper6358/completed paper (currentlyunder review).pdf |
Abstract | Sub-Saharan Africa has the highest maternal mortality ratio of any region in the world (World Health Organization & UNICEF, 2014). Maternal mortality arises from both inadequate maternal health services and inadequate uptake of existing services (Wilunda et al., 2015). Many women receive fewer than the recommended number of antenatal care visits or deliver without skilled assistance; appropriate obstetric care is less often obtained by unmarried women, those with lower household income, less education, or less educated partners, and those who have more children and have not had complications with previous pregnancies (Gabrysch & Campbell, 2009; Simkhada, Teijlingen, Porter, & Simkhada, 2008). Decision-making autonomy is another important determinant of the uptake of maternal health services. Women in developing countries are often precluded from household decision making, and this exclusion may also extend to reproductive health (Blanc, 2001). Power imbalances within relationships can interfere with women’s ability to access reproductive health services (Blanc, 2001; Upadhyay, Dworkin, Weitz, & Foster, 2014). Women, especially poor, uneducated women, are more likely to be in unequal relationships and have limited autonomy in accessing obstetric care (Beegle, Frankenberg, & Thomas, 2001; Blanc, 2001). In contexts of limited female autonomy and poor maternal health, facilitating joint decision making for obstetric choices may improve obstetric outcomes. Involving male partners in maternal health education has been found to improve obstetric outcomes in India and Nepal (Bhalerao, Galwankar, Kowli, Kumar, & Chaturvedi, 1984; Mullany, Becker, & Hindin, 2007). In this paper, we analyze data collected as part of the baseline survey of a cohort study of sexual and reproductive health in rural Lilongwe District, Malawi. Questions of maternal health and access to health services are especially relevant in Malawi, where more than a quarter (29%) of women still deliver without skilled assistance (National Statistical Office & ICF Macro, 2010). In this paper, we provide an overview of reported obstetric care, examining location of delivery, assistance at delivery, delivery complications, and birthweight. We then examine the relationships between who made obstetric decisions (woman, partner, joint) about the woman’s most recent delivery and two outcomes of interest (delivery location and complications) to assess whether facilitating joint decision making could be a useful reproductive health intervention in the region. |
» | Malawi - Demographic and Health Survey 2010 |