Type | Working Paper - Past and Present On-Farm and On-Station Initiatives |
Title | Soil Conservation in Nigeria |
Author(s) | |
Publication (Day/Month/Year) | 2008 |
URL | http://www.swcs.org/documents/filelibrary/SoilConservationInNigeria.pdf |
Abstract | Land degradation was a significant global issue during the 20th century and remains of high importance in the 21st century as it affects the environment, agronomic productivity, food security, and quality of life (Eswaran et al. 2001). Soil degradative processes include the loss of topsoil by the action of water or wind, chemical deterioration such as nutrient depletion, physical degradation such as compaction, and biological deterioration of natural resources including the reduction of soil biodiversity (Lal 2001). In Nigeria, West Africa, human-induced soil degradation is a common phenomenon. Its severity is light for 37.5% of the area (342,917 km2 ), moderate for 4.3% (39,440 km2 ), high for 26.3% (240,495 km2 ), and very high for 27.9% (255,167 km2 ) (UN Food and Agriculture Organization 2005). Soil erosion is the most widespread type of soil degradation in the country and has been recognized for a long time as a serious problem (Stamp 1938). In 1989, 693,000 km2 were already characterized by runoff-induced soil loss in the south and 231,000 km2 were degraded, mainly by wind erosion, in the north. Sheet erosion dominates all over the country, whereas rill and gully erosion are common in the eastern part and along rivers in northern Nigeria (Ologe 1988; Igbozurike 1989). Redistribution of soil by erosion and deposition is the result of perturbation and a natural landscape-forming process. However, it has been greatly accelerated by human activities in recent decades as the traditional shifting cultivation system has been replaced by more intensive but generally unstable cropping systems (Lal 1993a). The main reason for the land use intensification was and still is the increase in food production required to feed the rapidly growing population. For example, the Nigerian population has increased from 115 million in 1991 to 140 million in 2006 (Federal Republic of Nigeria 2007). The expansion of agriculture into marginal areas, deforestation, the shortening or elimination of fallows, inappropriate farming practices, and low input inevitably have several environmental and economic impacts, especially in sub-Saharan Africa where the resilience ability of the soil is limited (Lal 1995a). This expansion of agriculture causes onsite degradation of natural resources and productivity decline. For example, Mbagwu et al. (1984) observed that soil erosion causes a yield reduction of about 30% to 90% in some root-restrictive shallow lands of southern Nigeria. Off-site problems, such as the siltation of reservoirs, are also common consequences of soil loss. Hence, low agricultural production, food insecurity, low income of the rural population, and poverty are some consequences of soil erosion. Avoidance of soil loss by improved management and the conservation of natural resources is therefore important to maintain the functions of the soil and contribute to food security today and for future generations (Ehui and Pender 2005). Research on soil conservation has been conducted for many years in Sub-Saharan Africa (e.g., Fournier 1967; Greenland and Lal 1977; Quansah 1990; Kayombo and Mrema 1998; Ehrenstein 2002) and in Nigeria (Lal 1976a, 1990). Initiatives have resulted in various so-called on-farm strategies including agronomic measures, soil management, and mechanical methods, as well as off-farm strategies, including mechanical or biological soil conservation technologies. This work provides an extensive literature review to obtain information on past and present initiatives focusing on on-farm soil conservation strategies and their application in Nigeria (figure 1). Based on this, the most promising soil conservation technologies for the savanna are identified to improve the management and conservation of soil resources in the country |
» | Nigeria - Population and Housing Census 2006 |