Type | Working Paper |
Title | Does STEM Designation Matter?: A Longitudinal Analysis of T-STEM Academies' Performance in Mathematics |
Author(s) | |
Publication (Day/Month/Year) | 2016 |
URL | https://nctm.confex.com/nctm/2016RP/webprogram/Manuscript/Paper2401/Manuscript-Almus-Final.pdf |
Abstract | The purpose of this study was to investigate how STEM designation affected high school mathematics performance over the years by studying T-STEM schools. How T-STEM high schools’ mathematics performance changed by school type (Texas Public Schools (TPS) versus Charter Schools(CS)), gender, ethnicity, the number of years as a T-STEM designated school, socio-economic status, and at-risk student population was also examined. A total of 40 (N=40) stand-alone T-STEM designated high schools’ student level data was examined in this study. The analysis of the first question yielded results implying that T-STEM designation did not make any positively impact students’ mathematics performances over the years in T-STEM designated schools. For the second question, it was found that Charter School (CS) type T-STEM schools outperformed TPS type TSTEM schools in almost all grade levels. In addition, the analysis of the second research question revealed that T-STEM academies fell short of meeting the expectations of closing the achievement gap between male and female students, at –risk and non-at-risk students, students with differing socioeconomic status, and ethnic groups. Yet there are some differences between CS type T-STEM and TPS type T-STEM schools; CS type T-STEM schools seemed to be doing a better job in closing the achievement gap, especially for the at-risk and economically disadvantaged student groups. |
» | Albania, United Arab Emirates, Argentina...and 57 more - Programme for International Student Assessment 2012 |