Type | Book |
Title | Federalization of Foreign Relations: Discussing Alternatives for the Georgian-Abkhaz Conflict |
Author(s) | |
Publication (Day/Month/Year) | 2003 |
Publisher | Citeseer |
URL | http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.374.6727&rep=rep1&type=pdf |
Abstract | Since its declaration of independence on April 1991, Georgia’s sovereignty has been challenged by civil war and by secession attempts on the part of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Negotiations on the reintegration of these two entities through federalization have failed. The Russian Federation, the United Nations (UN), and the Organisation for Security and Cooperation (OSCE) in Europe were involved in a series of negotiations on a federal division of powers between Georgia, Abkhazia, and South Ossetia, but these negotiations did not achieve practical results. The positions between the Georgian government and the Abkhaz authorities concerning the status of Abkhazia have been moving even further apart. Negotiations between the Georgian government and the authorities of Abkhazia and South Ossetia have been focused thus far on the theoretical nature of sovereignty and the distinction between federation and confederation. They have not included any concrete views on institution building. This paper makes an attempt to go beyond these abstract discussions by presenting two possible models of a federalization of Georgia that would include Abkhazia and South Ossetia. It analyzes the practical consequences that a federal model of government would have on foreign policymaking. The authors of this paper have discussed these federation models with Georgian and Abkhaz officials, politicians, scholars, journalists, and representatives of the nongovernmental organization (NGO) community.1 This working paper reflects some of the results of those discussions. |
» | Georgia - General Population Census of 2002 |