Type | Journal Article - Economic Development and Cultural Change |
Title | So What If There Is Income Inequality? The Distributive Consequence of Nonfarm Employment in Rural China |
Author(s) | |
Volume | 50 |
Issue | 1 |
Publication (Day/Month/Year) | 2001 |
Page numbers | 19-46 |
URL | http://ihome.ust.hk/~sojk/Kung_files/edcc2001.pdf |
Abstract | The phenomenal rise of China’s rural nonfarm sector since around the mid- 1980s has been observed by many to have coincided with rising income inequality in the countryside.1 The intuitive reasoning behind this observation is that, with rural land ownership continuing to reside in the collectives (village authorities) and land distributions carried out in a highly egalitarian manner, household production—especially of farm goods—is an unlikely cause of income inequality.2 But with the rise of the nonagricultural sector in general and the township and village enterprises (TVEs) in particular, observers point to a widening in the income gap between households that have differential access to these lucrative income opportunities. In particular, in regions where local authorities had successfully developed their nonagricultural enterprises in the 1980s, farm households were able to benefit from these higher-income opportunities as these collective enterprises were still protected by the immobile factor markets across geographic regions.3 Indeed, based on a large-scale nationwide survey of the rural households in 1988, A. Khan et al. provide evidence on the disequalizing effect of wage income, despite its still insignificant magnitude, 10%, in overall household income.4 As wage employment will likely increase in the ensuing decades and therefore assume even greater importance in the overall composition of rural household income, the line of reasoning rehearsed above suggests the likelihood of deteriorating income equality over time: the only questions appear to be how much and how fast |
» | China - Rural Household Survey 1993 |