Type | Journal Article - China’s Food and Agriculture |
Title | Can Rural Income Growth Accelerate? |
Author(s) | |
Publication (Day/Month/Year) | 2002 |
Page numbers | 47-49 |
URL | http://www.ers.usda.gov/media/303452/aib775_1_.pdf#page=56 |
Abstract | Since the beginning of rural economic reforms in the late 1970s, rural incomes and living standards in China have improved dramatically, most notably during the early 1980s when productivity increased rapidly following the return to family farming. Real rural per capita incomes were nearly six times higher in 2000 than in 1978 (fig. N-1). However, income growth began from a very low base, and was uneven over time. Urban incomes grew even faster over the reform period, and China now has one of the largest urban-rural income disparities on record anywhere. According to China’s official statistics, rural incomes in 2000 were only 36 percent of urban incomes on average, compared with 77 percent in the United States. The growing urban-rural gap is partly attributable to policies historically biased in favor of urban areas, such as extractive rural procurement and taxation policies, biased investments, and a strict resident permit system that clearly divided urban and rural populations. The gap also is the result of rapid industrial growth in urban areas and restrictions on labor mobility that have prevented rural workers from benefiting fully from that growth. As China enters the new century, there is growing concern about whether the country can maintain momentum in increasing rural productivity and incomes. These concerns are punctuated by slow rural income growth in the late 1990s, the recent decline in employment in rural industry, and concerns that China’s entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO) will weaken the country’s agriculture. The recent relative stagnation of rural incomes in comparison with urban incomes highlights the importance of taking active steps to stimulate rural income growth. If effective, such steps will affect not only the welfare of millions of Chinese citizens but also the structure and competitiveness of the country’s agriculture and trade. |