Type | Thesis or Dissertation - Doctor of Philosophy |
Title | Geospatial Economics |
Author(s) | |
Publication (Day/Month/Year) | 2014 |
URL | http://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/174861/Johnson_umn_0130E_15122.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y |
Abstract | Understanding how economic systems interact with ecosystems requires models that include geospatial heterogeneity. Integration of economic and ecological systems is vital for sustainable development, especially with respect to climate change, food security and the management of common property resources. Advances in remote sensing and geographic information systems have created a wealth of data applicable to economics, but it is challenging to incorporate high-resolution, global data in existing economic models. In this thesis, I integrate geospatial data with economic theory to analyze important environmental problems. The next three chapters describe the techniques I use for modeling geospatially-explicit economic systems and apply them to current environmental challenges. Chapter one addresses the tradeoffs between food production and environmental protection. I address the question of how we can optimally feed a growing population (requiring a 100% increase in calorie production by 2050) while minimizing the loss of carbon storage (which is important for mitigating climate change). I use high-resolution, gridded global data to give geospatial specificity to the results of the optimization. The framework I present in this chapter includes only one production choice and one environmental good, but it is more broadly applicable to multiple goods and multiple ecosystem services. This chapter also shows how using geospatial data can increase the policy relevance of an analysis. For example, instead of claiming that tropical forests are in general very valuable, using geospatial data allows for the more precise claim that this specific 10 kilometer patch of forest is better kept as forest than cultivated. Spatially explicit information like this can help construct more specific policies, such as food-for-carbon swaps or identifying which parcels ought to be protected first given a limited conservation budget. |
» | Tanzania - National Panel Survey 2008-2009 |