Type | Conference Paper - XXVII IUSSP International Population Conference |
Title | Tempo and Quantum of Fertility in Iran: An Application of the Synthetic Parity Progression Ratio Method |
Author(s) | |
Publication (Day/Month/Year) | 2013 |
City | Busan |
Country/State | Korea |
URL | http://iussp.org/sites/default/files/event_call_for_papers/Hosseini-McDonaldSynPPRIUSSP.pdf |
Abstract | After a sharp fall in the 1990s, Iran’s fertility decline slowed down during the 2000s and TFR has fallen to around replacement level. Following two decades of fertility control policies, more recently, the Iranian Government has been concerned that fertility will fall to a very low level and a draft pronatalist policy has been designed and is being put to the parliament. The concern has been based on estimates that Iran’s current fertility is as low as 1.6 births per woman but there are questions about the reliability of estimates of fertility. There is a near-to-complete birth registration system but how near-to-complete is unknown. Own children estimates are possible but they too may not be sufficiently reliable. Furthermore, cross-sectional fertility measures can be confounded by changes in the timing of births across women's lifetimes (tempo) as well as by changes in the numbers of children that they have by the time they end their childbearing (quantum). When the age-based TFR is used, tempo and quantum can be assessed a long time after the fact by comparing the TFR for real birth cohorts with the cross-sectional or synthetic TFR. This is normally done by an offset or lag between the two series that is equivalent to the mean age of childbearing. The problems involved in assessing tempo and quantum using the age-based TFR can be overcome to a very large extent as we show in this paper by using parity progression ratios. The findings suggest that the Iran TFR is levelling off around replacement level and that tempo effects evident particularly in the 1990s are no longer evident. |
» | Iran, Islamic Rep. - Demographic and Health Survey 2000 |