Who pays for and who benefits from health care services in Uganda?

Type Journal Article - BMC Health Services Research
Title Who pays for and who benefits from health care services in Uganda?
Author(s)
Volume 15
Issue 1
Publication (Day/Month/Year) 2015
Page numbers 44
URL http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/s12913-015-0683-9.pdf
Abstract
Background: Equity in health care entails payment for health services according to the capacity to pay and the
receipt of benefits according to need. In Uganda, as in many African countries, although equity is extolled in
government policy documents, not much is known about who pays for, and who benefits from, health services.
This paper assesses both equity in the financing and distribution of health care benefits in Uganda.
Methods: Data are drawn from the most recent nationally representative Uganda National Household Survey 2009/
10. Equity in health financing is assessed considering the main domestic health financing sources (i.e., taxes and
direct out-of-pocket payments). This is achieved using bar charts and standard concentration and Kakwani indices.
Benefit incidence analysis is used to assess the distribution of health services for both public and non-public
providers across socio-economic groups and the need for care. Need is assessed using limitations in functional
ability while socioeconomic groups are created using per adult equivalent consumption expenditure.
Results: Overall, health financing in Uganda is marginally progressive; the rich pay more as a proportion of their
income than the poor. The various taxes are more progressive than out-of-pocket payments (e.g., the Kakwani index
of personal income tax is 0.195 compared with 0.064 for out-of-pocket payments). However, taxes are a much
smaller proportion of total health sector financing compared with out-of-pocket payments. The distribution of
total health sector services benefitsis pro-rich. The richest quintile receives 19.2% of total benefits compared to the
17.9% received by the poorest quintile. The rich also receive a much higher share of benefits relative to their need.
Benefits from public health units are pro-poor while hospital based care, in both public and non-public sectors are
pro-rich.
Conclusion: There is a renewed interest in ensuring equity in the financing and use of health services. Based on
the results in this paper, it would seem that in order to safeguard such equity, there is a need for policy that
focuses on addressing the health needs of the poor while continuing to ensure that the burden of financing health
services does not rest disproportionately on the poor

Related studies

»