This article examines gender differentials in the reporting of contraceptive use and offers explanations regarding the sources of these differences. Data from five countries where DHS surveys were conducted recently among men and women are used in exploring these differences. The gap exists in all five countries, with men (or husbands) reporting greater practice of contraception than women (or wives). Results from the bivariate analysis suggest that the gap is attributable to polygyny and to gender differences in how the purpose of contraception is understood, rather than to male extramarital sexual relations. Additionally, gender differences in the definition of certain contraceptive methods and differences in the interpretation of questions about contraception contribute to the observed gap. These findings are also consistent with results of the multivariate analysis.

An analysis of Demographic and Health Survey data from Central African Republic, Ghana, Haiti, Kenya, and Zimbabwe revealed large gender differentials in the reporting of contraceptive use. In all five countries, men/husbands reported greater practice of contraception than women/wives. This gap ranged from 5 percentage points in Ghana to 25 percentage points in Kenya. The reporting of contraceptive use by only one partner of a couple may result from multiple sexual relationships, secret contraceptive use, or differential perceptions of what constitutes contraception. In these five countries, most of the gender gap was associated with condoms, abstinence, and (in Zimbabwe) the pill. An analysis of these differentials suggests more overreporting of current use among husbands than underreporting among wives. To the extent that polygynous men are more likely than their wives to report use of methods of which the wife would have equal or more knowledge than the husband (e.g., the pill), a polygyny effect is indicated in Zimbabwe. The results for Ghana and Kenya (the only surveys where information on knowledge of the ovulatory cycle is available for husbands) suggest the gap in reporting of periodic abstinence results mainly from husband's inaccurate knowledge of the reproductive cycle and this method. Finally, if all the gaps in condom use between marital partners are attributed to the assumption of the differential role of condom use (pregnancy and sexually transmitted disease prevention), this factor would explain 12% (Haiti) to 38% (Ghana and Zimbabwe) of the net gap in contraceptive prevalence rate estimates. More detailed questioning on the use of condoms and periodic abstinence would improve the reliability of these surveys.