Type | Working Paper |
Title | Populism and Party-Society |
Author(s) | |
Publication (Day/Month/Year) | |
URL | http://www.igidr.ac.in/indiapolecon/Populism and Party-Society - Kalaiyarasan.pdf |
Abstract | It is increasingly recognised that the nature of political mobilization of classes and castes produces specific political regimes; and these regimes, in turn, set the path of policy regimes and developmental outcomes (Kohli 1987).Owing to specific regional histories and politics, there are variations in such political regimes. According to John Harriss (1999), Kerala, Tamil Nadu, and West Benga l are states with political regimes dominated by lower castes and classes – albeit in different ways. 1 Pranab Bardhan contrasts “welfare regimes” in West Bengal and Tamil Nadu and attributes the differences between the two to the divergent nature of regio nal social movements. He argues that regional capital in Tamil Nadu is more indigenised and the state has a ‘culture of wealth creation as opposed to redistribution’ (cited in Tillin 2013). |
» | India - Economic Census 2005 |