Using data from our own household survey (n=477) in Hanoi's peri-urban areas, this paper
attempts to answer (i) what livelihood strategies are pursued by peri-urban households, (ii) which
strategies are lucrative and which are not, and (iii) whether access to farmland is the potential barrier to
enter remunerative strategies. The paper uses cluster analysis techniques, based on identification of
household income shares by source, to provide the first classification of five livelihood strategies
pursued by households in Hanoi's peri-urban areas. Income sources and total income are compared
across livelihood strategies using Bonferroni pairwise tests and first-order stochastic dominant
analysis. The findings of the study show that non-farm income sources mainly contribute to total
household income, strategies based on formal wage work and non-farm household businesses are the
most remunerative ones and strategies based on farming and informal wage work are the most inferior
ones. Factors associated with households' livelihood strategy choice are examined using a multinomial
logit model. The findings reveal that farmland is negatively associated with the choice of both high and
low return non-farm-based strategies. This suggests that access to farmland is not a potential barrier to
enter lucrative strategies. In addition, education of working members has a positive impact on the
pursuit of remunerative strategies, implying that better education might shift households away from
farming activities. Age of household working members has a negative effect on the choice of wage
work-based strategies, suggesting that emerging non-farm opportunities make young workers less
interested in farm work. Finally, this paper proposes some policy implications that may help
households obtain better livelihood outcomes