National Risk and Vulnerability Assessment Survey 2007-2008
Afghanistan, 2007 - 2008
Created on
Oct 06, 2011
Last modified
Mar 29, 2019
Page views
422643
Downloads
32980
- Data files
- Area_Name
- Province
- District_CSO
- Female_Section_15_Food_1
- Female_Section_15_Food_2
- S15A
- CF1
- CF2
- CM1
- CM2
- CM3
- CM4
- District_Price
- S1
- S2A
- S_F
- S_M
- S2B
- S3
- S4
- S5A
- S5B
- S5C
- S6
- S7
- S8
- S9A
- S9B
- S10
- S11A
- S11B
- S12
- S13
- S14
- S15B
- S16
- S17
- S18
- S18_dc
- S19A
- S19B
- S20A
- S20B
- pccons_ptile
- pov_cons
- poverty0711
- poverty2007
Second reason how food-based programs benefited HH (q_10_6_2)
Data file: S10
Overview
Valid:
890
Invalid:
19680
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
0
Width:
50
Range:
-
Format:
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category |
|---|---|
| 1 | No benefit |
| 2 | Increased the quantity of food consumed |
| 3 | Increased the quality of food consumed |
| 4 | Reduced food expenditures |
| 5 | Cash from food sales for non-food items |
| 6 | Cash from food sales paid off debts |
| 7 | Cash from food sales invested in productive assets |
| 8 | Improved literacy/education |
| 9 | Income generating skills acquired |
| 10 | Improved school attendance |
| 11 | Other (Specify) |
| Sysmiss |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.