Community Skills Development Centers 2016
Namibia, 2016
Get MicrodataCreated on
Jan 16, 2021
Last modified
Jan 16, 2021
Page views
9898
Downloads
805
- Data files
- COSDEC_followup_PUF
In your opinion, what was the quality of the written material at the program (t1_b26_2)
Data file: COSDEC_followup_PUF
Overview
Valid:
29
Invalid:
613
Type:
Discrete
Decimal:
0
Start:
883
End:
892
Width:
10
Range:
1 - 2147483639
Format:
Numeric
Questions and instructions
Literal question
In your opinion, what [is/was] the quality of the written materials at the vocational training programme you [attend/attended] - good?
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Excellent | 12 |
41.4%
|
| 2 | Good | 15 |
51.7%
|
| 3 | Fair | 0 |
0%
|
| 4 | Poor | 2 |
6.9%
|
| 99 | Other | 0 |
0%
|
| 2147483625 | Don't know | 0 |
0%
|
| 2147483635 | Not applicable | 0 |
0%
|
| 2147483639 | Refused | 0 |
0%
|
| 11 | .E | 613 |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Interviewer instructions
Probe when necessary