Hunger Safety Net Programme Impact Evaluation 2009-2010

Kenya, 2009 - 2010

Get Microdata

Reference ID

KEN_2009_HSNP-BL_v01_M

Producer(s)

Oxford Policy Management Limited

Metadata

DDI/XML JSON

Created on

Feb 19, 2014

Last modified

Mar 29, 2019

Page views

65299

Downloads

2001

P2_Q17a Description (P2_Q17a_OtherDes)

Data file: HHPreamble

Overview

Valid: 148

Invalid: 0

Type: Discrete

Start: 940

End: 1037

Width: 98

Format:

Questions and instructions

Categories

Value	Category
BAD LUCK
Did not attend registration
Did not meet criteria
Did not meet registration
Did not meet the criteria
I was left out because the required number of beneficiaries was full
I was told by the programme representertives that we are young we cannot be registered
REJECT BY HSNP STAFF WHO WERE DOING TARGETING
THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF BENEFICIARIES WAS ALREADY OBTAINED
TOO YOUNG
Told that the target number of beneficiaries had already been reached
Was not above 55yrs
able to work
bad luck
bad luck they said
bad luck they say
bad luck"they said
because one of her son is working.
can work and provide for her kids
did go becauce of sickness
did not meet criteria
did not meet critria used
did not meet set criteria
don`t need it
due to bad luck they say,
had three cows
it was not fair
it was notfair
it`s totaly unfair
method not fair
method not unfair
method totally unfair
method ued unfair.
method unfair
method use was totaly unfair
method used are too unfair
method used does not consider the poor
method used not fair
method used not favourable for young people who are the mojarity and most poor
method used totaly unfair
method used totaly unfair.
method used unfair
method used was not fair
method ussed not understood
never bunderstand mthod used
not all poor were targeted
not aware untill it was too later
not fair
not from targeted location
not from the sub-location
not lucky
not lucky enough
not married by then
only old are selected
only old are targeted
only old are targted
only old were selected
only old were targetted
people were many I coulb not be considered
process not fair
process totaly unfair
secondary recepient for her mother who is abeneficiary in rhamu
she had mental ilness.
target number too low
targeted number of people very few
targetig criteria not fair
targeting mechanism only favours old not young.
targeting mechanism unfair
that imnot deserving
the process is not fair
the process not fair
the process was not fair
the required number of beneficiaries was already established
the required number of beneficiaries was already obtained
the required number of beneficiaries was enough
the target number of beneficiaries had already been acquired
there are so many poor young than the old targeted, method totaly unfai
they said computer selected people
they select 55 and above and am not qualified.
told computer rejected names
told computer rejected the HH
told lost by his bad luck
too busy to attend registration
too sick
too young
under 55 age
unfair method used
village elder told the programme officials not to register me
was a secondary recepient for her mother
was busy
was not interested
was rejected by the area chief
was told by programme representatives that women who have husbands are not required for HSNP
was told only the old are required
was told she lost because of bad luck
was told she lost with her bad luck
was told the computer rejected their names
was told the machine rejected my names

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Back to Catalog