IHSN Survey Catalog
  • Home
  • Microdata Catalog
  • Citations
  • Login
    Login
    Home / Central Data Catalog / KEN_2009_HSNP-BL_V01_M / variable [F43]
central

Hunger Safety Net Programme Impact Evaluation 2009-2010

Kenya, 2009 - 2010
Get Microdata
Reference ID
KEN_2009_HSNP-BL_v01_M
Producer(s)
Oxford Policy Management Limited
Metadata
DDI/XML JSON
Created on
Feb 19, 2014
Last modified
Mar 29, 2019
Page views
54966
Downloads
1753
  • Study Description
  • Data Dictionary
  • Downloads
  • Get Microdata
  • Related Publications
  • Data files
  • 3moves
  • 3table
  • 5table
  • 6education
  • 6health
  • 6personnel
  • 6table
  • 7food
  • 7food1
  • 7other
  • 7other1
  • comq_linking_BL
  • comq_weights
  • coversheet
  • section1
  • section2
  • section3
  • section4
  • section5
  • section8
  • section9
  • section10
  • section11
  • section99
  • HHAsset
  • HHAssetLivelihood
  • HHBeneficiaries
  • HHChild
  • HHconsData
  • HHCopingStrategy
  • HHData
  • HHEmploymentProramme
  • HHEnrollment
  • HHEnterprise
  • HHEnterpriseMember
  • HHFoodAid
  • HHFoodconsData
  • HHItemPurchaseDistance
  • HHLand
  • HHLivestock
  • HHMember
  • HHOtherDescription
  • HHPreamble
  • HHProvidedFor
  • HHTransfer
  • HHVisit
  • HHWives
  • hh_weights_original
  • ClusterMaster
  • disaggregation_data

P2_Q05a Description (P2_Q05a_OtherDes)

Data file: HHPreamble

Overview

Valid: 50
Invalid: 0
Type: Discrete
Start: 391
End: 467
Width: 77
Format:

Questions and instructions

Categories
Value Category
Assured the programme will come back
JUST LEFT DON'T NO WHY
Rejected by chief
Was at work
able to work
bad luck
by bad luck
can work
don 't know
don`t know
don`t known
his mothe was selected
it was segregative methods used
medotho not fair
method not fair
method not fair.
method total unfair
method unfair
method used not understood
method used totaly unfair
method used unfair
not all the poor were selected
not married by then
not selected
process not fair
process totaly unfair
some poor were left out
targetting was not fair.
the proccess was`t fair
those people who did registration were not fair,
totally rejected
unfair method used
was a secondary recepient for my mother
was given negative information concerning the programe
was present but not registered during registration
was unfair
went to the town
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Back to Catalog
IHSN Survey Catalog

© IHSN Survey Catalog, All Rights Reserved.