Smallholder Rice Farmers in Ghana’s Kpong and Weta Irrigation Projects

Ghana, 2013 - 2015

Get Microdata

Reference ID

GHA_2013-2014_KIP_v01_M

Producer(s)

Daniel Ayalew Ali, Derick Bowen, Klaus Deininger, Markus Goldstein, Angeli Kirk, Tricia Koroknay-Palicz

Metadata

Documentation in PDF DDI/XML JSON

Study website

Created on

Oct 12, 2023

Last modified

Oct 12, 2023

Page views

40169

Enumerator comments (anyadditionalcomments)

Data file: hfdc_s2m1_final

Overview

Valid: 2550

Type: Discrete

Start: 3839

End: 4060

Width: 222

Range: -

Format: character

Questions and instructions

Categories

Value	Category
01 plot rain started late on the farm. 04 plot is maize farm
05 parcel belongs to the husband
09:21
18:20
19:50
[no answer]
after explaining things to her she says she might allow to be interviewed next time but not this time around
after several days attempt to reach the respondent for an interview she no longer picks my calls
already interviewed with code 108044
already interviewed with different code of 786(120019).repetition
both 02, and 03 has not yet apply fertilizer
could not remember
could not remember date
could not remember dates
could not remember dates. she is a treatment farmer
could not remember the dates
could not rememner dates
could nt remember dates
dates are not exact dates
did not enter information on parcel 04 because it is a pepper farm. respondent had subleted the land hence could not tell those sold during the minor season
did not parcel np1 in the 2013 minor season and was fallow
disruption at the tail end of interview as respondent had to attend to an emergency before continuing
due to an accident he could supervise the harvesting for the minor season and wad done by the wife
has subleted his land hence harvesting would not be applicable
he could not tell who is farming the parcel
he couldnt harvest the minor 2013 bcos he couldnt get money to buy herbicide to control the weeds
he did all labour works alone
he did not farm on none of the parcel during minor season
he did not farm on the minor season. he sold his all parcel
he didnt farm parcel one in minor 2013
he didnt farm the last two parcels last season
he does all farm labour works by himself
he does all labour work
he does every labour work alone
he does everything by himself. tilling and crossing with chop money for parcel 01 is 290 and not 190 as recorded ealier. mistake from respondent.
he farms the two parcels as one. they are not seperated as on the baseline parcel
he gave parcel to the son.
he have two parcels on the same section
he hired casual group to do gap filling at a cost of ghc60
he is a treatment farmer
he is in treatment group
he is no more farming
he is not filling well so he gave out his parcels this season. the farm owners also resubleted the parcels out to different farmers.
he is not willing to give any information about the current cultiivator of the parcel and other questions about himself
he is on his way to work and therefore less time to spend with the enumerator.
he is recieving treatment from gadco. thats why he didnt sale any rice
he is with gadco
he never want to my call again
he said gadco supplies him with materials when we i was almost done with him on this interview
he said is on gadco after finishing with interview
he was already interviewed with id nl3359 118073
in the baseline respondents parcel was separated instead of one whole.
in the baseline, the enumerator treated the parcel differently splitting it into a hectare each. but its 3 hectares in total.
interview was completed the next morning ( day).
is not the primary respondent
it appears that respondent has 2 parcels in the baseline book but she says only 1.
it is the farm manager who responded to questions because the respondent was not around
it was after interview that respondent told me he was the farm manager to the son
it was difficult identifying the individual parces at block with their sizes.
land subleted
merge
merge parcel
merge parcel parcel was not captured during baseline or hfdc survey allocated: 2 (1nherited)
merge wih parcel 1
merge with first interview
merge with first parcel
merge with parcel 1
merge with parcel 1. the parcel . the respondent said he has just subleted the parcel to start cultivating 2014 minor and beyond.
merge with parcel1
merge work
milled rice is 50kg bag
n0
no
none
not concise with dates
not interested in being interviewed
not interested in taking photo
not intrested
not willing to take photo
not willing to take photograph
parcel 01 and 03 is the same parcel captured twice and not farmed because it is under litigation
parcel 01 had 33 bags of unmilled rice gmg maxi sold at 90 cedis. parcel one, three and four belong to his mother and two sisters acting as their farm manager
parcel 02 and 03 are not rice parcels and he stop farming those none rice parcels
parcel 02 and 03 are under litigation
parcel 02 does not belong to him rather his brother.....
parcel 02 has been taken from him by the owner.
parcel 02 is under litigation hence under the custody of the dce for now until resolved
parcel not captured in baseline book
parcel one is a hired plot and the owner has taken parcel back with two and three being household parcels
parcel subleted since last minor hence cant give information on number of bags sold and price
parcel two is waterlogged hence left fallow and does not want picture taken
parcel was not captured in the roster
parcels are 1,2,3,4,6 and not 1,2,3,4,5. respondent during the end of interview mentioned he had given out the last two parcels out to gadco
phone was freezing every now and then why it took a while to finish administering questionnaire
reapondent did not farm the plot this seasing
refuce to take photo due to personal reason
refuced to take photo
refuse
refuse photo
refuse to mention his age
refuse to take photo
refuse to take photo due to personal reasons
refuse to take photo, not even a single sack was harvested in the minor season
refuse to take picture due to personal reasons
removed for publication
respomdent farm only 01 and he does not no anything about 02 and 03.but he also refuse the photo.
respond refused to take picture
respondent does not know who is currently cultivating the parcel, since it has taken from him.
respondent has subleted his parcels out to the friend
respondent acquired second parcel only this major hence bags of rice for last minor not applicable
respondent already interviewed with 814 106342 with gadco id rk3385
respondent already interviewed with codes 224 128033 with gadco id cz3092
respondent already interviewed with codes 659 125032 and gadco id rk3144
respondent complain about mice eating the seeds when sowed and seedlings been cut down by them. he says they spend much money in buying chemicals to control them.
respondent consistently postpones date for interview
respondent could not recall how much he was paid by gadco
respondent could not remember the dates of activities and so the dates given were not exact dates.
respondent could not remember the quantities of rice she sold out during the 2013 minor season as it was a long time ago
respondent did all the input application by himself and did not hire labour
respondent did not farm 2013 minor for 01 and gave out the 04 to his brother during that same season
respondent did not farm during the minor
respondent did not farm during the minor and the second parcel in the treatment code book is not part of the irrigation scheme
respondent did not farm during the minor season
respondent did not give out his age
respondent did not pay for kobuta service as the husband owns it
respondent did not want to mention the name of the primary cultivator for second parcel
respondent does not have any parcel for 02 and for 03 it is under litigation hence no farming activity for now
respondent does not have the contact of the one cultivating parcel 02 as she owns the land
respondent does not no her age
respondent does not want to be involved with future interviews
respondent doesnt feel comfortable taking the picture
respondent dont want see me
respondent farm all the parcell at the same place
respondent farm parcel 1,2,3 as one parcel and connot give seperate answers for each parcel.
respondent farm parcell 01,02,03,04 at one area. and parcell 05,06,07,08 also at one area
respondent first parcel is 1.5 hectare and he did not pay for komoter charge as he owns it hence 00
respondent gadco id on the phone is at variance with what is in the book hence the latter was used
respondent gave out his land last minor hence cant give out how many bags of rice sold and he did not want his picture taken as was just recovering from an illness
respondent had a challenge last minor hence could not sell the rice to gadco
respondent had to make her husband answer most questions as she was furious over gadco maltreatment
respondent harvested his rice only yesterday
respondent has all his paecels at the same area
respondent has already been interview with 106:066
respondent has already been interviewed with 755 101003 with gadco id cz3102
respondent has already been interviewed with 827 with nl3027 106 027. name appeared twice
respondent has already been interviewed with 998 128054 and gadco id sl3041
respondent has already been interviewed with codes 683 125006 and gadco id rk3176
respondent has been farming on np01 for sometime now except it was not captured during the last round
respondent has his own kobuta hence 111 was entered as you cant enter -111 and proceed with interview
respondent has left his two parcels fallow and might be farming next season or will be subleting
respondent has lost his phone but will get one soon with the same number
respondent has only 1 parcel but was treated as 2 in the baseline.
respondent has only 1 parcel that he is cultivating .
respondent has only one parcel since baseline survey.
respondent has only three parcels
respondent has released parcel 02 back to the owner and 03, 04 belong to the husband
respondent has released the third parcel to its owner
respondent has subleted
respondent has subleted all his parcels could not give info on how many bags sold for last minor
respondent has subleted all the parcels.
respondent has subleted her parcels and might farm during the minor season
respondent has subleted her plots
respondent has subleted his parcel
respondent has subleted his parcel out and will farm next minor
respondent has subleted land and will farm next season but not ready to answer some question
respondent has subleted land for 2 years
respondent has subleted out her parcel and might start farming next major
respondent has subleted out the farm. she asked the son to answer questions as she was no longer farming and he had the information
respondent has subleted parcels 04,05 and was a bit busy
respondent has subleted the land
respondent has subleted the land and would start farming next season
respondent has subleted the land for over a year
respondent has subleted the land hence did not want to give out more information
respondent has subleted the parcel and could not get other infornation from him
respondent has subleted the parcel and not willing to give further details
respondent has subletes his parcel and other information not forth coming
respondent is milling rice and she is busy, she only answered for 2 parcels.
respondent is deceased
respondent is deceased and the one who picked up the phone was not ready to give a lot of details
respondent is in anger state and is not ready to be further interviewed.
respondent is leaving land fallow this season and would farm next minor
respondent is never available to be interviewed
respondent is no longer farming
respondent is no longer farming on parcel 02
respondent is not consistence with her age
respondent is not consistence with the dates
respondent is not consistent with the dates
respondent is not likely to farm on the second parcel this season
respondent is not sue about his dates
respondent is on his parcel working and has less time to spend with me.
respondent is preparing newly acquired parcels for next season as he cannot farm this season
respondent is ready travelling for a funeral and could not continue with other parcels.
respondent later had to call the son to give information on the dates for most activities
respondent left his land fallow for 2013 minor
respondent lost his phone but would go for the previous number
respondent name appeared twice
respondent never meets scheduled dates and times for interview
respondent not availing himself for the interview
respondent not cooperating in giving answers as she is tired of too many interviews
respondent not willing to give out much information
respondent only cultivates 1 parcel instead of 2 captured in the baseline,
respondent owns the kobuta hence 0 was entered 111 cant skip to next question parcel 03 is c5 b1 and not sllc b1
respondent paid for gap filling for two people though not in a group for 7 dayd s hence i averaged the wage at 10 cedis
respondent parcels had same locations hence had to be differentiated
respondent planted on the same day and did most of the activities on same say for parcel one and two
respondent refuse the photo
respondent refuse the photograhp
respondent refuse the photograph
respondent refuse to give me her age and educational levol
respondent refuse to give me the amount gadco has paid her
respondent refuse to give me the primary cultivaters number
respondent refuse to take the photo
respondent says gadco disppointed him so he is no more under ccsp prpject.
respondent says he did not do top dressing on any of his farms
respondent says he had only 1 parcel during the baseline but the enumerator made it 2 as it appears in the respondent tracking book,
respondent says he is exhausted as he had a long day and do not want to talk about the rest.
respondent says he might take over his land next major
respondent says he no longer has a farm
respondent says he sold the unmilled rice at 90 for the minor and not 85
respondent says his second parcel 02 is slightly more than 2 acres
respondent says information about parcel 01 is the same across for parcel 02. moreover they are at one place.
respondent says parcel 01 is block 9 and parcel 02 is block 10 and under litigation
respondent says she would not avail herself for further interviews
respondent second parcel as captured in the book is a maize farm and not a rice farm
respondent second parcel in the treatment list is a cassava farm and should not have been captured under the irrigation scheme
respondent second parcel is separeted with bonds hence bond2
respondent sold 30 bags of the unmilled rice and not 4
respondent started the major season very early
respondent subleted for only one season
respondent subleted his land and could not provide some details and obviously could not be finishing harvesting(n/a)
respondent subleted parcel 01 during last year minor and parcel 02 was released to owner and 03 left fallow this season
respondent subleted the land for only this season and would farm on it next season
respondent subleted the land last minor and would be farming next minor
respondent subleted the land this major as a result of ill health
respondent was already interviewed with code 128070
respondent was charged double as a result of how deep her parcel is hence 800 cedis
respondent was interviewed with codes nl 3405 106393
respondent was not available during harvesting for minor hence cannot tell how much sold as has not yet reconciled with the sister
respondent was not comfortable with picture taking
respondent was not willing to give out any details as he only said he had given out the parcel out and would not answer any further questions
respondent was not willing to give out some information as a result of having subleted out the land during the major season
respondent who gave information on behalf of the sister does not want her picture to be taken and she does not have a phone
respondent will be farming next minor season
respondent wont farm this season on parcel 03 as a result of financial problems
respondent would not give out much information beyond the one cultivating the parcels as he does not want to be bothered
respondent's parcel was not captured in the baseline booklet
respondent's spouse answered questions for the husband as he was unavailable
respondents son had to help with most of the dates as the mum could not recall
respondents two parcels had the same location hence was captured as not part of baseline parcels to differentiate them
second parcel as captured in the baseline treatment book is outside the irrigation scheme
second parcel in the list the farmer does not know that land and never farmed on it
she didnt give any info on the 2nd parcel
she does not want to be bothered with further interviews going forward
she doesnt have two sperate parcels at gate 1 area a. only one parcel and she is not farming it this season
she gave the parcel to the brother to farm. unfortunately the is not able to fa it this year
she has been sick so she couldnt fa again
she is at funeral and she says she can only do interview for only 01
she is not feeling too well so she declined taking the picture
she not farming on section 7 farm anymore bcos the land is not good.o
she refused to mention her age
she said the section a9 land is not good so nobody is farmin on that land anymore
she said we should refer to baseline parcel for her age and educational level
she sold 155 gmg milled bags for all parcels farmed at ghc90. she cldnt recall for each parcel so the total amoint was recorded at the 3rd parcel
shes no more cultivating the parcels
should be merge with first interview
subleted his land
survey 29 sect. 1 quetion 41 is no. survey 29 section 1 quetion 16 is no
the parcel was splitted into 2 during the baseline but is 1 in actuality, sized 4 acres.
the current primary cultivator is a son to the formal but she is unwilling to provide the name of the son who is the current primary cultivator
the farm manager is the cultivator's father and he has only done the management work for a few months when cultivator was out of town for studies. but .now the cultivator is back to manage it herself with the father's help
the farm manager responded to this imterview. could not remember dates
the farmer cannot remember the dates
the first parcel was not farmed last season. she didnt sell any produce from parcel 2 last season as she lost greatly. she is now thinking of whether to farm parcel 2 this season or not and so for now it is fallow
the land is fallow
the new cultivator of the parcel is a family member but does not know his number
the one who answered questions for the respondent is a friend and as a result of having travelled subleted his parcels to him
the one whose picture was taken is the respondent's and only told me after the interview
the parcel id is np1 and not 1.
the respondent could not give actual dates but estimated
the respondent couldnt farm because there are issues concerning his farm land
the respondent did all labour works by himself
the respondent do not remember her dates question 12 should be 1
the respondent has only one parcel but it was splitted in the baseline survey.
the respondent hope to farm his parcels in the major season
the respondent hopes to farm parcel 01 next season
the respondent is already interviewed with code 106-136
the respondent is of age and therefore handed the parcels to the farm manager,
the respondent is sick and hence not farming
the respondent is very furious with our presence and not interested in the interview
the respondent spouse does the interview on her behalf
the respondent was interviewed with codes nl3047 108-029 on treatment
the respondents parcel has been splitted in the baseline but is 1 parcel at the same place.
the second parcel is added is the same as the first parcel. according to the respondent and it is one acre
the was no light at home and it was dark so no picture could be taken
the whole minor season, respondent did not cultivate the parcel.
tired of so many interviews

Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.

Back to Catalog