State Health Investment Project: Impact Evaluation Endline Survey, 2017
Nigeria, 2017
Get Microdata
Reference ID
NGA_2017_HRBFIE-EL_v01_M
Producer(s)
Eeshani Kandpal (World Bank)
Created on
Dec 05, 2022
Last modified
Aug 28, 2024
Page views
142634
Downloads
507
- Data files
- cardio_drugs_noid.dta
- Catchment_Area_noid.dta
- decr_services_noid.dta
- diagnostic_kits_noid.dta
- FP_drugs_noid.dta
- general_drugs_noid.dta
-
Health Facility
(HF1)_noid.dta - HF1_Sect08_noid.dta
- HF1_sect10A_noid.dta
- HF1_Sect10B_noid.dta
- incr_services_noid.dta
- interview_actions_noid.dta
- interview_comments_noid.dta
- malaria_drugs_noid.dta
- obstetric_care_noid.dta
- Q1611_positions_noid.dta
- services_noid.dta
- TB_drugs_noid.dta
- vaccines_noid.dta
- anc_patients_noid.dta
- HF3_HCP_Info_noid.dta
- HF4_HCP_Info_noid.dta
- HF4_patients_noid.dta
- interview_actions_noid.dta
- interview_comments_noid.dta
-
Patient DIRECT
OBSERVATION
(HF3_HF4)_noid.dta - HF5_ASSETS_noid.dta
- HF5_LIVESTOCK_noid.dta
- HF5_patients_noid.dta
- HF6_ASSETS_noid.dta
- HF6_LIVESTOCK_noid.dta
- HF6_patients_noid.dta
- interview_actions_noid.dta
- interview_comments_noid.dta
-
Patient EXIT
INTERVIEW
(HF5_HF6)_noid.dta -
Health Care
Provider
Interviews
(HF7)_noid.dta - HF7_Q202_noid.dta
- interview_actions_noid.dta
- interview_comments_noid.dta
- staff_roster_noid.dta
- Durable_Goods_noid.dta
- hhroster_noid.dta
- interview_actions_noid.dta
- interview_comments_noid.dta
-
NSHIP IE
Midline
Household Women
Questionnaire_noid.dta - Q16_13_noid.dta
- S5C_Assets_noid.dta
- S9_Vaccines_noid.dta
- Sec_05B_noid.dta
- Sec_06A_noid.dta
- Sec_06B_noid.dta
- Sec_06C_noid.dta
- Sec_07_noid.dta
Q4.05_spc: Other reasons for salary increase (HF7_Q405_spc)
Data file: staff_roster_noid.dta
Overview
Valid:
3222
Invalid:
-
Type:
Discrete
Start:
1105
End:
1200
Width:
96
Range:
-
Format:
character
Questions and instructions
Categories
| Value | Category | Cases | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3171 |
98.4%
|
||
| advancement | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| advancement/confirmation | 1 |
0%
|
|
| After a complain to the incharge. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| after biometric screening | 1 |
0%
|
|
| After complaining to the incharge | 1 |
0%
|
|
| because of diploma and policy of LG. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Because of increase in service delivery at the facility. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| because she now works in a public health facility | 1 |
0%
|
|
| because she now works in another health facility | 1 |
0%
|
|
| before was paid on table but now in bank | 1 |
0%
|
|
| change of payment system | 1 |
0%
|
|
| change of work from a private hospital to a state specialist hospital. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| change of work place | 1 |
0%
|
|
| changed Job | 1 |
0%
|
|
| community and the facility head helps me through meeting with the dff people | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Conhynce. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| conversation from health Assistance to CHEW | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Corrected Consolidated medical salary structure | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Depending on the Government in power | 1 |
0%
|
|
| DFF intervention | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| don't know | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| Don't know | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Due to increment in PBF quarterly payments. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Employment | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
| HATIS (harmonised salary structure) | 1 |
0%
|
|
| I complained it was too small | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Increment not explained. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| it was 47 and was reduced to 36 with the knowledge of what brought about that, thanks. | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Just got employed this year | 1 |
0%
|
|
| new job | 1 |
0%
|
|
| New job | 1 |
0%
|
|
| No reason given. | 2 |
0.1%
|
|
| PBF intervention | 1 |
0%
|
|
| percentage | 1 |
0%
|
|
| promoted but not implemented | 1 |
0%
|
|
| proper Placement | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Proper Placement | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Rural Hardship allowance | 1 |
0%
|
|
| Salary corrected | 1 |
0%
|
|
| salary was corrected | 1 |
0%
|
|
| The respondent said initially that she was been paid 15,000 but it was later increased to 20,000 | 1 |
0%
|
|
| The salary increased because of upgrade of my qualifications | 1 |
0%
|
|
| was formally working as a casual staff before being enrolled into the PBF programme. | 1 |
0%
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.